CVE-2026-89460

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

s390/cpum_cf: Handle CPU hotplug via prepare/dead callbacks

The command 'perf stat -e cycles -- ' crashes the kernel when CPUs are hotplug added during that run.

Root cause is the allocation of struct cpu_cf_events at first event initialization. The allocation is dynamic and the first event that has task context creates such a structure for each online CPU. This is not sufficient. CPUs may be offline during event creation and can be set online during the perf run time. For example commands

# echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online # perf stat -e cycles -i -- stress-ng -t10s --matrix X # sleep 1 # echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online

create an event for CPUs 0,2-X. Since the events are created with task-context, the scheduler will eventually schedule the program on CPU1. This CPU has not created and initialized any per CPU event infrastructure as that CPU was not online at the time of the perf invocation. Thus when the scheduler runs stress-ng on CPU1, the function cpumf_pmu_add() refers to a NULL pointer:

struct cpu_cf_events *cpuhw = this_cpu_cfhw();

This function call is invoked after the task stress-ng has been made runnable on CPU1. And this_cpu_cfhw() returns NULL.

The result is a panic: Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference in virtual kernel address space Failing address: 0000000000000000 TEID: 0000000000000483 .... Krnl PSW : 0404d00180000000 000003ef8291fd0c (cpumf_pmu_add+0x3c/0x80) .... Call Trace: [<000003ef8291fd0c>] cpumf_pmu_add+0x3c/0x80 [<000003ef82bb5e3e>] event_sched_in+0xae/0x190 [<000003ef82bb60d6>] merge_sched_in+0x1b6/0x390 [<000003ef82bb65b8>] visit_groups_merge.constprop.0.isra.0+0x308/0x5b0 [<000003ef82bb689a>] pmu_groups_sched_in+0x3a/0x50 [<000003ef82bb6a30>] ctx_sched_in+0x180/0x260 [<000003ef82bb780c>] perf_event_context_sched_in+0x11c/0x2d0 [<000003ef82bb79ee>] __perf_event_task_sched_in+0x2e/0xc0 [<000003ef82994834>] finish_task_switch.isra.0+0x1a4/0x250 .... Last Breaking-Event-Address: [<000003ef8291f1d8>] this_cpu_cfhw+0x38/0x40

The issue arises only in per-task context when the CPUMF facility is used and the scheduler picks a random CPU for such a process to run on. The scheduler enables the CPUMF infrastructure via PMU callback functions pmu::add() and pmu::del().

Introduce a CPU hotplug prepare/dead callback pair which creates and removes the per CPU counter data while the CPU is offline. Count the users which track every CPU (cpu == -1), that is perf_event_open() events with task context and /dev/hwctr device sessions, in the new counter cpu_cf_root::tskcnt, protected by pmc_reserve_mutex. This ensures the infrastructure is available when new CPU is selected to run the per-task context process.

In cpum_cf_free_root() and cpum_cf_free_cpu() ensure the reference pointer to data structures is set to NULL before the data is freed to prevent interrupt handlers to access stale data.

[[email protected]: change commit message]

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-89460(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 44× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:48 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 02:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  10. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 10:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  18. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-10-01 14:42 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-01 14:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  21. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-28 18:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  23. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  25. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
Show 24 more
  1. 2026-09-25 22:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  2. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-09-23 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  5. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-09-20 05:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  9. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-09-17 09:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  12. 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-09-14 13:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  16. 2026-09-14 13:27 UTCNVD update
  17. 2026-09-14 12:31 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-14 12:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-qv9g-m2j2-jrgj
  19. 2026-09-14 12:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  20. 2026-09-13 16:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-09-11 20:36 UTCNVD update
  23. 2026-09-11 19:51 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-11 19:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-89460?
CVE-2026-89460 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: s390/cpum_cf: Handle CPU hotplug via prepare/dead callbacks The command 'perf stat -e cycles -- <command>' crashes the kernel when CPUs are hotplug added during that run. Root cause is the allocation of struct cpucfevents at first…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-89460 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-89460 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89460 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89460 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89460?
A fix for CVE-2026-89460 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89460 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89460

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89460?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.