In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
s390/percpu: Fix MVIY_PERCPU() with older binutils
Commit a737737cdb9c ("s390/percpu: Infrastructure for more efficient
this_cpu operations") introduced MVIY_PERCPU(), which stringifies
arguments that are already C string literals. This generates an
assembler macro invocation with whitespace-separated quoted arguments:
GEN_MVIY "459712" "%r3"
GNU as versions prior to binutils 2.39 drop the separating whitespace
between quoted macro arguments during input scrubbing. They
consequently parse the invocation as a single argument and emit
repeated warnings:
Warning: missing closing `"'
The .ifc in GEN_MVIY never matches and GNU as exits successfully
without emitting the mviy instruction. As a result, the interrupted
per-CPU sequence is not marked in lowcore and the exception return
path cannot repair the per-CPU address register after migration.
All MVIY_PERCPU() callers pass C string literals. Use them directly
and separate the assembler macro arguments with an explicit comma. The
resulting invocation is:
GEN_MVIY 459712, %r3
This form is unambiguous for GNU as and LLVM's integrated assembler.
This behavior was fixed in GNU as from binutils 2.39, but Linux
supports binutils 2.30.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
The CVE record names the fixed release. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it