CVE-2026-89045

MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.04.0
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 4.0 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-10. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.0; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Elevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-75634 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

4.0EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.0Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

zstd-jni versions 1.4.8-4 through 1.5.7-13 fail to validate negative length parameters in ZstdInputStreamNoFinalizer.read(), allowing attackers to trigger infinite loops. Attackers can pass negative length values to cause the read method to spin indefinitely while holding the stream monitor, blocking all other threads from accessing the stream.

CVSS v3
4.0
EG Score
4.0MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
34
EG Risk 34/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity40% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 4.0 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (4.0): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 4.0 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
4.0 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source, and whom BOD 26-04 binds: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

The score's inputs: In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 10, 2026

Last Modified

September 15, 2026

Advisory Details (5)

Auto-updated Sep 10, 2026
Patch available. Sources: github, github_commit.
Web page

zstd-jni 1.4.8-4 through 1.5.7-13 Denial of Service via Negative Length | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/zstd-jni-1.4.8-4-through-1.5.7-13-denial-of-service-via-negative-length
Web page

GitHub - luben/zstd-jni: JNI binding for Zstd · GitHub

https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni
Web page

zstd-jni/src/main/java/com/github/luben/zstd/ZstdInputStreamNoFinalizer.java at v1.5.7-13 · luben/zstd-jni · GitHub

https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/blob/v1.5.7-13/src/main/java/com/github/luben/zstd/ZstdInputStreamNoFinalizer.java#L133
GitHub commit

commit dd08685ef913 (luben/zstd-jni)

Fix landed in luben/zstd-jni commit dd08685ef913 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/commit/dd08685ef913a32e76fb27f43470035c06758646
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Infinite Loop via Negative Length in ZstdInputStreamNoFinalizer.read() · Advisory · luben/zstd-jni · GitHub

https://github.com/luben/zstd-jni/security/advisories/GHSA-9jx2-gfp9-phfm

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
redhatzstd-jni2026-09-21redhat

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
zstd-jni-java1.5.2-5+ds-3 ... 1.5.4-2+ds-3~exp4 (12 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
zstd-jni-java1.5.2-5+ds-7 ... 1.5.4-2+ds-3~exp4 (8 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
zstd-jni-java1.5.2-5+ds-7 ... 1.5.4-2+ds-3~exp4 (8 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 55× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 133 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 33 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-11-03 16:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-11-02 16:46 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  3. 2026-11-01 16:36 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  4. 2026-10-31 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  5. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  6. 2026-10-29 22:25 UTCOSV refresh
  7. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  8. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  9. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  11. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  12. 2026-10-25 13:53 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-24 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-22 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-22 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  18. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-10-18 03:03 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-14 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 19:15 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-11 13:48 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 07:03 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-11 07:03 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-11 07:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  12. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-10 04:54 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-10 04:54 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-10 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  16. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 07:07 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-09 07:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  19. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 09:27 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-08 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  22. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-10-07 11:48 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-07 11:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  25. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  26. 2026-10-06 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-06 14:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  28. 2026-10-05 17:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  29. 2026-10-05 16:23 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-10-05 16:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  31. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  32. 2026-10-04 17:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  33. 2026-10-03 19:39 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-10-03 19:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  35. 2026-10-02 22:01 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-02 22:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  37. 2026-10-02 00:22 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-10-02 00:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  39. 2026-10-01 19:51 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  40. 2026-10-01 01:25 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-10-01 01:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  42. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  43. 2026-09-30 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-30 03:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  45. 2026-09-29 06:08 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-29 06:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  47. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  48. 2026-09-28 08:30 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-28 08:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  50. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  51. 2026-09-27 10:52 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-27 10:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  53. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  54. 2026-09-26 12:48 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-26 12:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  56. 2026-09-25 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  57. 2026-09-24 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-24 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  59. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  60. 2026-09-23 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-23 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  62. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  63. 2026-09-22 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-22 20:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  65. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  66. 2026-09-21 23:08 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-21 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  68. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  69. 2026-09-21 01:30 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-21 01:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  71. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  72. 2026-09-20 03:52 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-20 03:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0
  74. 2026-09-19 06:11 UTCEG score recompute
  75. 2026-09-19 06:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r8cw-jvfx-h6x5 · GitHub CVSS 4.0

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-89045?
CVE-2026-89045 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 10, 2026. zstd-jni versions 1.4.8-4 through 1.5.7-13 fail to validate negative length parameters in ZstdInputStreamNoFinalizer.read(), allowing attackers to trigger infinite loops. Attackers can pass negative length values to cause the read method to spin indefinitely while holding the stream monitor,…
When was CVE-2026-89045 made public?
CVE-2026-89045 was made public on August 14, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, VulnCheck, gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on September 10, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-89045 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-89045 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-89045?
CVE-2026-89045 has a CVSS base score of 4.0 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-89045?
A fix for CVE-2026-89045 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-89045 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-89045

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-89045?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.