An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the configuration management subsystem of Brocade Fabric OS versions before 9.2.2d and 10.0.0 through 10.0.0a1. When performing a configuration download operation, the management daemon will relay configuration parameters, user-supplied relay host strings, and filenames directly to an internal utility script without sufficient character set validation. Because the local utility fails to sanitize shell metacharacters before processing them in a system shell command, a malicious or compromised configuration file can cause arbitrary operating system commands to be executed on a remote local switch when an administrator initiates a configuration download.
CVE-2026-87675
“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.
This high-severity CVE scores 7.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.7% (53rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.
The CVE record's CNA (Brocade Communications Systems LLC, a Broadcom Company) lists Brocade Fabric OS versions before 9.2.2d and 10.0.0 up to and including 10.0.0a1 as affected. No release containing a fix is confirmed on record.
- CVSS v3
- 7.3
- EG Score
- 7.3HIGHmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 33EG Risk 33/100
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)Severity73% × 45%The EG Score, 7.3 of 10.Exploitation0.7% × 40%FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.Automatability0% × 15%CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. - EPSS PROB
- 0.7%
- EPSS %ILE
- 53rd
- KEV
- Not listed
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it
Published
October 8, 2026
Last Modified
October 9, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Oct 8, 2026Support Content Notification - Support Portal - Broadcom support portal
https://support.broadcom.com/external/content/SecurityAdvisories/0/39146Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-87675(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)
Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.
- 2026-10-13 05:07 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-13 05:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-12 14:50 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-12 04:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-11 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 16:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-11 16:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 04:46 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-11 04:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
- 2026-10-10 16:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-10 04:35 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-10 04:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
- 2026-10-09 16:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-09 04:26 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-09 04:05 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-09 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-08 20:17 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 20:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 52nd percentile
Show 5 moreShow fewer
- 2026-10-08 13:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 13:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-866x-57qx-q5cx · GitHub severity HIGH
- 2026-10-08 04:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 03:57 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.3 HIGH
- 2026-10-08 03:56 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-87675?
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-87675 published?
Is CVE-2026-87675 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-87675?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-87675?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-87675
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-87675?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.