CVE-2026-86325

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.49.4—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This critical-severity CVE scores 9.4 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (25th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
9.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 9.4Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in protocol gateways' account management interface. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient length validation of the account_name parameter when processing account management requests. An attacker authenticated as a read-only user to the web management interface could supply a specially crafted account name that exceeds the size of the internal stack buffer, resulting in corruption of program execution flow. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to read sensitive information from device memory, including credentials, modify arbitrary memory contents, and disrupt device availability.

CVSS v3
9.4
EG Score
9.4CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
42
EG Risk 42/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity94% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
25th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

October 2, 2026

Last Modified

October 2, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Oct 2, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-86325(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 17× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-04 11:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-04 07:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-04 03:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-03 23:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-03 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-10-03 15:42 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 15:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-03 11:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-10-03 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-03 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-02 23:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-02 19:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-02 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-02 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-02 11:01 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-02 10:32 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-02 10:30 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-86325?
CVE-2026-86325 is a critical vulnerability published on October 2, 2026. A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in protocol gateways' account management interface. The vulnerability is caused by insufficient length validation of the account_name parameter when processing account management requests. An attacker authenticated as a read-only user to the web…
When was CVE-2026-86325 disclosed?
CVE-2026-86325 was first published on October 2, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-86325 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-86325 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (25th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-86325?
CVE-2026-86325 has a CVSS base score of 9.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-86325?
No fix for CVE-2026-86325 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-86325 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-86325

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-86325?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.