src/internal.c in wolfSSL wolfSSH through 1.5.0 admits the server-to-client Diffie-Hellman group exchange messages SSH_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP (31) and SSH_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY (33) when a server receives them from an unauthenticated client. IsMessageAllowedServer() applies no direction check to the key exchange message range: when the peer is keying and no particular message is expected, which is the state a server is in for the whole window after it processes the client's KEXINIT because nothing sets handshake->expectMsgId there, the function falls out of its expectation branch without a verdict and reaches a numeric bound that admits every message id from 30 through 34. A client that negotiates diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256 and then sends message 31 makes the server run the client-side handler DoKexDhGexGroup(), which validates the attacker-supplied group with two 8-round Miller-Rabin primality tests, one on p and one on (p-1)/2, on a value of up to 8192 bits. The handler then returns success: the server stores the attacker's prime and generator, generates a Diffie-Hellman key pair in the attacker's group, and sends the client-role message SSH_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT (32) back to the attacker. Published RFC 3526 safe primes are the worst-case input and cost the attacker nothing to obtain. The primality validation was added in 1.5.0; versions from 1.2.0 through 1.4.22 admit the same message and enter the same client-role path without the primality cost. Message 33 is admitted as well, but on a server it is rejected before any cryptography because no public key check callback is registered, so it carries no comparable cost. Builds that define WOLFSSH_NO_DH_GEX_SHA256, which is implied by WOLFSSH_NO_DH or NO_SHA256, are unaffected.
CVE-2026-84897
This medium-severity CVE scores 6.9 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3% (20th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
A fix is available — apply it.
- CVSS v3
- 6.9
- EG Score
- 6.9MEDIUMmedium confidence
- EG Risk
- 46EG Risk 46/100CISA SSVC
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity69% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high. - EPSS PROB
- 0.3%
- EPSS %ILE
- 20th
- KEV
- Not listed
CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table
Published
October 7, 2026
Last Modified
October 7, 2026
Advisory Details (4)
Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026commit a472f1ee2b65 (wolfSSL/wolfssh)
Patch available: wolfSSL/wolfssh v1.6.0-stable (contains commit a472f1ee2b65)
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssh/commit/a472f1ee2b653f623d85ef2297321733f1dbfd22Reject the KEX replies a server never receives
Patch available: wolfSSL/wolfssh v1.6.0-stable (PR #1221 merged 2026-09-02)
https://github.com/wolfSSL/wolfssh/pull/1221Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-84897(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(3)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 15× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-09 16:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-08 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-08 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-10-07 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 19:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-07 18:47 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 18:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-07 16:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-07 03:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-10-07 03:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-10-07 03:01 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-84897?
When was CVE-2026-84897 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-84897 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-84897?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-84897?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-84897
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-84897?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.