xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) DOMParser and XMLSerializer module. Prior to @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.8.14 and 0.9.11, and in xmldom version 0.6.0 and earlier, Document.createElement(tagName) stores an unvalidated element name and XMLSerializer.serializeToString() emits that name verbatim. The requireWellFormed: true path did not validate the element qualified name or synthesized xmlns:PREFIX declaration, so attacker-controlled tag names could inject attributes, elements, or processing instructions into serialized XML or HTML and could cause cross-site scripting when browser-consumed. The unchecked values violate the XML QName constraint, and default serialization and creation-time createElement() behavior remain permissive. This issue is fixed in @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.8.14 and 0.9.11; no fixed version is available for xmldom.
CVE-2026-83607
This high-severity CVE scores 8.7 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.3%, top 72% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.7
- EG Score
- 8.7(medium)
- EG Risk
- 70(Attend)EG Risk 70/100SSVC: Attend
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity87% × 45%Exploitation40% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Remediate soon — notable exploitation risk. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 28%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 1, 2026
Last Modified
September 8, 2026
Advisory Details (7)
Auto-updated Sep 1, 2026Release 0.9.11 (xmldom/xmldom)
Patch available: xmldom/xmldom 0.9.11
https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/releases/tag/0.9.11Release 0.8.14 (xmldom/xmldom)
Patch available: xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14
https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/releases/tag/0.8.14commit d8212e632507 (xmldom/xmldom)
Patch available: xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 (contains commit d8212e632507)
https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/commit/d8212e632507eaf1d9f609657dd4c56abeb12d44commit cba1321218b0 (xmldom/xmldom)
Patch available: xmldom/xmldom 0.9.11 (contains commit cba1321218b0)
https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/commit/cba1321218b069182695813fa7565653708e172efix: reject invalid element and attribute names when requireWellFormed
Patch available: xmldom/xmldom 0.8.14 (PR #1050 merged 2026-08-12)
https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/pull/1050fix: reject invalid element and attribute names when requireWellFormed
Patch available: xmldom/xmldom 0.9.11 (PR #1043 merged 2026-08-12)
https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/pull/1043Element name injection via createElement() bypasses requireWellFormed · Advisory · xmldom/xmldom · GitHub
https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/security/advisories/GHSA-w2rr-34g9-rvrjVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-83607(2)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Affected Packages
(5 across 4 ecosystems)
npm(2)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| xmldom | — | — | — |
| @xmldom/xmldom | — | 0.8.14 | — |
Debian:12(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-xmldom | 0.8.6-1 ... 0.9.9-1 (9 versions) | — | — |
Debian:13(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-xmldom | 0.9.10-1 ... 0.9.9-1 (7 versions) | — | — |
Debian:14(1)
| Package | Vulnerable range | Fixed in | Dependents |
|---|---|---|---|
| node-xmldom | 0.9.10-1 ... 0.9.9-1 (6 versions) | 0.9.11-1 | — |
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 50× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-18 23:01 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 23:01 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 09:52 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 20:44 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 20:44 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-17 19:32 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-17 03:11 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-17 03:11 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 14:09 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 14:02 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 14:02 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 00:15 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 11:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 11:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-14 21:58 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-14 08:48 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 19:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-13 19:40 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-13 06:31 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-12 17:22 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-12 17:22 UTCVendor advisory
Show 25 moreShow fewer
- 2026-09-12 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 15:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-11 15:06 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-10 12:49 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 10:32 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-09 10:32 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-08 07:42 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-07 18:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-07 18:34 UTCVendor advisory
- 2026-09-06 16:10 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-06 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-05 00:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-02 20:00 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-01 16:25 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 14:34 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-01 14:33 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same vendor + same CWE)
Same vendor
10 shownmsrc
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-91
- CVE-2021-4140EG 10.0CRITICAL
- CVE-2023-43187EG 9.8EPSS p99CRITICAL
- CVE-2019-19450EG 9.8EPSS p91CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-37154EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21830EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2021-21829EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-29128EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-25216EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-8479NVD 9.4EG 9.8CRITICAL
- CVE-2020-11535EG 9.8CRITICAL
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-83607?
When was CVE-2026-83607 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-83607 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-83607?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-83607?
Dependency Blast Radius
See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-83607
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-83607?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.