CVE-2026-83531

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.8%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation) — apply it.

Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') vulnerability in Apache Camel.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.4.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.

The dynamic-router-control endpoint, introduced in 4.4.0, lets routing participants manage Dynamic Router subscriptions by sending control messages. When it handled a subscribe or update request, DynamicRouterControlProducer took the subscription predicate and the name of the language used to compile it from the incoming message, either from the predicate and expressionLanguage fields of a DynamicRouterControlMessage body or from the CamelDynamicRouterPredicate and CamelDynamicRouterExpressionLanguage headers. DynamicRouterControlService then resolved that language from the CamelContext and compiled the expression into a Predicate, with no allow-list and no opt-in. The compiled predicate was added to the channel's rule base and evaluated against every exchange routed through the corresponding dynamic-router endpoint for as long as the subscription existed. A route that forwards messages from an external transport to the control endpoint, as shown in the component documentation for routing participants in other JVMs or applications, therefore let any actor able to send a message on that transport supply an expression of their choosing, which was evaluated with the privileges of the Camel process. Any expression language available on the classpath could be selected, including the simple language, which is always present and was the default on the header path, so removing optional expression languages from the classpath did not prevent the issue. Exploitation requires the ability to send a message on a transport whose route forwards it to a dynamic-router-control endpoint; no other authentication or user interaction is needed. Releases before 4.4.0 are not affected, because their control channel took predicate expressions only from the endpoint URI configured by the route author.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. After upgrading, a control message that carries a predicate expression or an expression language is rejected unless the new allowPredicateFromMessage option is enabled on the dynamic-router-control endpoint; enable it only when every sender of control messages is trusted. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, do not forward messages from untrusted or shared transports to a dynamic-router-control endpoint. Where control messages must cross such a transport, authenticate the sender and make sure the predicate and expression language of each subscription are set by the route rather than taken from the incoming message, for example by removing the CamelDynamicRouterPredicate and CamelDynamicRouterExpressionLanguage headers and clearing the predicate and expressionLanguage fields of a DynamicRouterControlMessage before it reaches the endpoint. Removing optional expression languages from the classpath is not a sufficient workaround. As defence in depth, restrict who can send to the transports that feed the control endpoint, and on 4.23.0 and 4.22.1 set the allowedSchemes option of the dynamic-router endpoint to limit which endpoints a subscription's destinationUri may name.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0% × 40%
No KEV listing, EG-KEV tier or EPSS when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation). Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.8%
EPSS %ILE
55th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.8% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation). Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 20, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Apache Software Foundation). Sources: github_pr.
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24576: sync 4.22 and 4.18 upgrade guides with the dynamic-router backports

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #26020 on 2026-09-02 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/26020
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.18.x] CAMEL-24576: camel-dynamic-router - do not take the subscription predicate from the control message by default

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #26019 on 2026-09-02 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/26019
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.22.x] CAMEL-24576: camel-dynamic-router - do not take the subscription predicate from the control message by default

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #26018 on 2026-09-02 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/26018
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24576: camel-dynamic-router - do not take the subscription predicate from the control message by default

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25992 on 2026-09-01 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25992
Web page

[CAMEL-24576] camel-dynamic-router: align control endpoint parameter handling with the allowTemplateFromHeader convention - ASF Jira

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24576
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-83531 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-83531.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-83531(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 13× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  2. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  3. 2026-10-20 04:27 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-20 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68m6-7hmq-4c53 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-20 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-20 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68m6-7hmq-4c53 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  7. 2026-10-19 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-19 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68m6-7hmq-4c53 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  9. 2026-10-19 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-19 17:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-68m6-7hmq-4c53 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  11. 2026-10-19 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-19 10:39 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.8 HIGH
  13. 2026-10-19 10:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-83531?
CVE-2026-83531 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 19, 2026. Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection'), Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an Expression Language Statement ('Expression Language Injection') vulnerability in Apache Camel. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.4.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-83531 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-83531 was published on October 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 20, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-83531 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-83531 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.8% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (55th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-83531?
CVE-2026-83531 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-83531?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2026-83531, written by its CNA Apache Software Foundation, names the fix: "Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-83531 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-83531

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-83531?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.