CVE-2026-82741

LOWPre-NVD 2.12.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

This low-severity CVE scores 2.1 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.1%, top 97% of all CVEs by exploit prediction. GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: epss, secondary
Elevated
2.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 2.1Exploit: Elevated riskExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability in ash-project ash lets an attacker confuse the stored type tag of an Ash.Type.Union value that uses storage: :map_with_tag, bypassing that member's validation and any tag-based authorization.

For a union with storage: :map_with_tag, each member is identified in storage by a configured tag and tag_value. Ash.Type.Union.dump_to_native/2 (lib/ash/type/union.ex) did not force the configured tag when writing the value, so a tag carried in the submitted value was persisted verbatim. An attacker can therefore store a value whose data belongs to one member but whose tag names a different member. On read the value is re-selected by its tag and treated as the incompatible member (a type confusion), bypassing the real member's constraints and any logic or policy that branches on the union tag. The fix drops any incoming tag and forces the configured tag value on dump.

This issue affects ash: from 2.14.18 before 3.32.2.

CVSS v3
2.1
EG Score
2.1(medium)
EG Risk
25(Track)
EG Risk 25/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity21% × 45%
Exploitation40% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
3%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 1, 2026

Last Modified

September 1, 2026

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Hex(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFixed inDependents
ash2.14.18 ... 3.9.0 (368 versions)3.32.2

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 7× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-09-17 15:12 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-09-14 11:38 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-09-11 08:05 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescore
  10. 2026-09-08 04:32 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-09-05 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-04 05:07 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-09-02 14:12 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-09-01 16:28 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-01 15:56 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-09-01 13:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-09-01 04:39 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-01 03:47 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-01 03:43 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-82741?
CVE-2026-82741 is a low vulnerability published on September 1, 2026. Improper Validation of Specified Type of Input vulnerability in ash-project ash lets an attacker confuse the stored type tag of an Ash.Type.Union value that uses storage: :mapwithtag, bypassing that member's validation and any tag-based authorization. For a union with storage: :mapwithtag, each…
When was CVE-2026-82741 disclosed?
CVE-2026-82741 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 1, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-82741 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-82741 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 96.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-82741?
CVE-2026-82741 has a CVSS v3 base score of 2.1 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-82741?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-82741, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-82741

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-82741?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.