CVE-2026-82438

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-14. CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: cisa-adp, epss, ghsa
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

Description

Three separate mechanisms allowed a web page on an unrelated origin to read responses that Storm's HTTP components served to an authenticated user.

The Logviewer reflected the request's Origin header back in Access-Control-Allow-Origin while also sending Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true. The published security model documents a permissive Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * posture as accepted, which is safe precisely because browsers refuse to honour * together with credentials; reflecting the concrete origin removes that protection.

The shared CORS filter used by the UI, the Logviewer and DRPC was configured with a response header name where an initialisation parameter name was expected. The container ignored the setting and applied its own defaults, which allow credentials.

Finally, the UI and Logviewer wrapped API responses in a caller-supplied JSONP callback for every GET request. A script element on any origin can load such a response, which bypasses the same-origin policy entirely rather than negotiating it, and there was no way to turn the behaviour off.

In each case the effect is that a page visited by an authenticated operator can read cluster, topology and log data on their behalf.

Mitigation

Upgrade to 3.1.0, where the Logviewer no longer reflects the request origin in a credentialed response, the CORS filter is configured explicitly, and JSONP wrapping is governed by ui.enable.jsonp, which defaults to false.

Note that disabling JSONP is a behaviour change for tooling that passes a callback query parameter; such tooling should be moved to ordinary JSON requests.

Users who cannot upgrade immediately should place the UI, Logviewer and DRPC HTTP endpoints behind a reverse proxy that strips Access-Control-Allow-Origin and Access-Control-Allow-Credentials from responses and rejects requests carrying a callback parameter.

Credit

The ASF -- found using Claude agents to study the security of open-source projects, validated and reported by Apache Storm.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1(high)
EG Risk
37(Track)
EG Risk 37/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity81% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability0% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
10%
KEV
Not listed

Published

September 14, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (1)

Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-82438(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 24× in last 7d / 24× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-09-19 00:34 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-09-19 00:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-09-18 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-09-17 23:51 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-09-17 23:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-09-17 10:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-09-16 22:26 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-09-16 22:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-09-16 10:06 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-16 10:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-09-15 21:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-09-15 09:24 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-15 09:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-14 21:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-09-14 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-14 20:00 UTCEG score recompute 8.10
  20. 2026-09-14 20:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-09-14 19:59 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.1 · severity → HIGH
  22. 2026-09-14 15:21 UTCNVD update
  23. 2026-09-14 14:25 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-14 14:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-82438?
CVE-2026-82438 is a high vulnerability published on September 14, 2026. Description Three separate mechanisms allowed a web page on an unrelated origin to read responses that Storm's HTTP components served to an authenticated user. The Logviewer reflected the request's Origin header back in Access-Control-Allow-Origin while also sending…
When was CVE-2026-82438 disclosed?
CVE-2026-82438 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on September 14, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-82438 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-82438 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 90.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-82438?
CVE-2026-82438 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-82438?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-82438, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-82438

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-82438?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.