CVE-2026-81578

CRITICALNVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to NVD's CVSS score.

Score elevated to 9.8 because this CVE is listed on the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (added 2026-08-31), indicating real-world exploitation has been confirmed by US federal agencies. It is also listed on ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue (Source: ENISA EUVD). NVD baseline CVSS 9.8 retained for reference. Confidence: HIGH.

Triggered by: CISA KEV (actively exploited)
Sources: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, EPSS, ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue, GitHub Security Advisory, NVD CVSS v3
Trending — 4 sources updated this weekExploited in the wild

Also known asEUVD-2026-67713 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictMitigate nowTreat as an emergency — this is being exploited.
  • Actively exploited in the wild (CISA-KEV) — the reason this is sooner than the SSVC decision on this page at low or medium mission impact
CISA-KEV: ExploitedENISA EU KEV: Listed (Source: ENISA EUVD)EPSS PROB: 84%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: Metasploit · other public PoCExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

An improper access control vulnerability exists in the web management interface of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. Under specific conditions, unauthenticated remote requests targeting administrative functions can trigger backend actions prior to the completion of access validation checks. This allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to modify certain system configurations.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALhigh confidence
EG Risk
99
EG Risk 99/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity98% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation100% × 40%
Fixed at 100% for a CISA KEV listing: EchelonGraph's rule.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
EPSS PROB
84%
EPSS %ILE
99th
KEV
⚠ Exploited

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.8 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
84% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
CISA KEV and ENISA EU KEV (Source: ENISA EUVD) and EG-KEV Tier 1 (exploited in the wild)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Attend at medium mission impactAttend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

ENISA EU KEV: listed August 27, 2026, reported by ENISA.

Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement. How a listing moves the EG score

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Attend at low or medium mission impact; Act at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that sooner than your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and as soon as possible at high; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Exploitation active (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)3 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 14 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV yes (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

CISA required action“Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.”

Quoted verbatim from CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. CISA directs it at US federal civilian executive branch agencies under Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 26-04, which replaced BOD 22-01 on 10 June 2026; it is not EchelonGraph's advice. CISA's notes: https://www.papercut.com/kb/Main/security-bulletin-27-aug-2026-urgent-security-advisory/ · https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk · https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk · https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-81578

Published

August 28, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 26, 2026
⚠️ Actively exploited (CISA KEV, CISA Vulnrichment). Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github_pr, cisa.
CISA🔴 Active Exploitation

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA

Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog | CISA. Listed in CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog?field_cve=CVE-2026-81578
GitHub pull request

Add exploit module for the recent PaperCut MF/NG 0day (CVE-2026-81578 + CVE-2026-82078)

Fix merged in rapid7/metasploit-framework PR #21842 on 2026-09-03 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/21842
Web page

URGENT Security Advisory: PaperCut NG/MF Security Bulletin (27 Aug 2026) | PaperCut

https://www.papercut.com/kb/Main/security-bulletin-27-aug-2026-urgent-security-advisory/

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81578(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 147× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 397 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 297 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-27 09:16 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-27 09:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  3. 2026-10-26 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 84% · 99th percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-25 13:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  7. 2026-10-25 13:46 UTCENISA EU KEV listingEUVD-2026-67713 · listed August 27, 2026 · reported by ENISA · Source: ENISA EUVD
  8. 2026-10-25 00:43 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-25 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  10. 2026-10-24 02:59 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 02:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  12. 2026-10-23 05:13 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-23 05:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-22 07:27 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-22 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-21 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
  18. 2026-10-21 09:43 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-21 09:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-20 11:57 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-20 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
  23. 2026-10-19 14:12 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-19 14:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  25. 2026-10-18 16:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-18 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-18 01:27 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-18 01:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  4. 2026-10-17 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-17 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  6. 2026-10-16 05:53 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-16 05:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  8. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
  9. 2026-10-15 08:08 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-15 08:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  11. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
  12. 2026-10-14 10:23 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-14 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  14. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
  15. 2026-10-13 12:36 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-13 12:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  17. 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-12 14:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  19. 2026-10-12 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  20. 2026-10-12 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  21. 2026-10-11 22:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  22. 2026-10-11 19:20 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 17:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  24. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 13:42 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-11 13:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  27. 2026-10-11 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  28. 2026-10-11 05:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  29. 2026-10-11 00:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  30. 2026-10-10 20:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  31. 2026-10-10 16:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  32. 2026-10-10 12:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  33. 2026-10-10 08:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  34. 2026-10-10 03:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  35. 2026-10-09 23:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  36. 2026-10-09 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  37. 2026-10-09 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  38. 2026-10-09 10:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  39. 2026-10-09 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  40. 2026-10-09 02:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  41. 2026-10-08 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  42. 2026-10-08 17:48 UTCEG score recompute
  43. 2026-10-08 17:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  44. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 86% · 99th percentile
  45. 2026-10-08 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  46. 2026-10-08 09:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  47. 2026-10-08 05:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  48. 2026-10-08 00:46 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-10-08 00:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  50. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 85% · 99th percentile
  51. 2026-10-07 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  52. 2026-10-07 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  53. 2026-10-07 12:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  54. 2026-10-07 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  55. 2026-10-07 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  56. 2026-10-06 23:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  57. 2026-10-06 19:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  58. 2026-10-06 14:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  59. 2026-10-06 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  60. 2026-10-06 06:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  61. 2026-10-06 02:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  62. 2026-10-05 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-10-05 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  64. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 85% · 99th percentile
  65. 2026-10-05 17:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  66. 2026-10-05 13:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  67. 2026-10-05 09:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  68. 2026-10-05 04:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  69. 2026-10-05 00:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  70. 2026-10-04 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  71. 2026-10-04 16:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  72. 2026-10-04 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  73. 2026-10-04 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  74. 2026-10-04 03:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8
  75. 2026-10-03 23:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-44wc-j6f2-7fjr · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 9.8

Publicly available exploits

(4 references)

Public exploit code is referenced for this CVE (1 Metasploit module, 1 GitHub PoC), as are 1 Nuclei detection template, 1 GitHub checker repository. A detection template checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. A GitHub repository named or described as a checker or scanner checks whether a system is affected; it is not necessarily exploit code. No release with the fix is confirmed, so defenders should restrict or isolate affected systems accordingly until one is applied.

  • Metasploitexploit/multi/http/papercut_ng_external_user_lookup_rce✓ verified
    Published Sep 3, 2026

    PaperCut NG/MF Unauthenticated RCE (CVE-2026-81578 + CVE-2026-82078)

    Open source ↗
  • Nucleihttp/cves/2026/CVE-2026-81578.yaml
    Published Sep 15, 2026

    PaperCut NG/MF <=26.0.4 - Unauthenticated ConfigEditor Access via Tapestry Complex-Direct

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub checkervirologi-info/papercut-toolkit
    Published Aug 29, 2026

    #PaperCut CVE-2026-81578 + CVE-2026-82078 Defense Toolkit 2 3 A **defensive** toolkit to check and understand exposure to the chained

    Open source ↗
  • GitHub PoCyora1928/PaperCut-CVE-2026-81578-82078
    Published Aug 29, 2026

    Security research tool for PaperCut CVE-2026-81578 & CVE-2026-82078

    Open source ↗

Frequently asked(6)

What is CVE-2026-81578?
CVE-2026-81578 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 28, 2026. An improper access control vulnerability exists in the web management interface of PaperCut MF and PaperCut NG. Under specific conditions, unauthenticated remote requests targeting administrative functions can trigger backend actions prior to the completion of access validation checks. This allows…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-81578 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-81578 was published on August 28, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-81578 actively exploited?
Yes. CISA added CVE-2026-81578 to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog on August 31, 2026, affecting PaperCut NG/MF. KEV listing indicates confirmed exploitation in the wild; this CVE warrants immediate attention. A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. ENISA's EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue lists CVE-2026-81578 (added August 27, 2026, reported by ENISA): ENISA records its exploitation in the wild. Source: ENISA EUVD (EU Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue), reproduced with acknowledgement.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81578?
CVE-2026-81578 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
Which products are affected by CVE-2026-81578?
CVE-2026-81578 affects PaperCut NG/MF.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81578?
A fix for CVE-2026-81578 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-81578 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-81578

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81578?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.