CVE-2026-81003

HIGHPre-NVD 8.18.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-09-11. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
8.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.3%CVSS: 8.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/iucv: filter frames in afiucv_hs_rcv() by ingress device

afiucv_hs_rcv() selects a socket from iucv_sk_list by matching four 8-byte name fields in the transport header alone. No check is made against the net_device the frame arrived on.

This can cause a frame arriving on any netdev to be delivered to an AF_IUCV socket. Three problems follow.

First, a frame arriving over HiperSockets can be delivered to a socket bound to the classic z/VM IUCV transport, which has iucv->hs_dev == NULL. iucv_sock_bind() takes the classic path whenever the requested userid matches iucv_userid, even on a guest that also has a HiperSockets device carrying the same identifier. The child socket created by afiucv_hs_callback_syn() for such a match inherits hs_dev = NULL and transport = AF_IUCV_TRANS_HIPER, so the first send() on it returns -ENODEV. The socket delivered to accept() is unusable.

Second, a frame arriving on one netdev can be delivered to a socket bound to a different IQD device. Which can lead to

  • Accept-queue exhaustion (DoS)
  • Attacker-controlled peer identity in the child socket
  • Data injection into existing sockets
  • Fabric noise on the IQD fabric, where bogus replies are sent
  • killing established connections

Third, all AF_IUCV sockets live in init_net, as iucv_sock_alloc() calls sk_alloc(&init_net, ...). But even frames arriving on netdev devices in a namespace can be delivered to an IUCV socket. So a process in an unprivileged user and network namespace holding only the CAP_NET_RAW capability valid within that namespace can send a raw ETH_P_AF_IUCV frame on its own lo device and have it matched against init_net sockets.

Fix all three by skipping any socket whose hs_dev does not match the ingress device. A classic z/VM IUCV socket has hs_dev == NULL; the ingress dev is never NULL, so classic sockets are skipped automatically. An unbound HIPER socket also has hs_dev == NULL and is skipped. A bound HIPER socket is only reachable from the exact IQD device it was bound to. Because hs_dev is always a device in init_net (iucv_sock_bind() scans for_each_netdev_rcu(&init_net, ...) exclusively), a frame whose ingress device belongs to another namespace never matches any socket.

Note that AF_IUCV over HiperSockets provides no per-connection authentication: no sequence numbers, no TLS, no nonce. The four name fields identifying a connection are exchanged in plaintext on the shared HiperSockets segment (VCHID). Any host on the same HiperSockets segment could spoof any frame type against an existing connection. That is a protocol-level property unchanged by this patch. The fix reduces the attack surface to peers present on the same HiperSockets segment.

CVSS v3
8.1
EG Score
8.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
37
EG Risk 37/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity81% × 45%
The EG Score, 8.1 of 10.
Exploitation0.3% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.3%
EPSS %ILE
22nd
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Sep 13, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

net/iucv: filter frames in afiucv_hs_rcv() by ingress device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/80230a18c164a4b5bbc048fe2768b219ac17bc5a
Web page

net/iucv: filter frames in afiucv_hs_rcv() by ingress device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a7f0130a091724e69827ab58e74777a88747e892
Web page

net/iucv: filter frames in afiucv_hs_rcv() by ingress device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8e3763f1ccac3fc395f9af2b87114c023ced8a3f
Web page

net/iucv: filter frames in afiucv_hs_rcv() by ingress device - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/dfac2936b83be00035ae176f8252e1c1e1de9207

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-81003(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (179 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(1)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 35× in last 7d / 171× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 182 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 82 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 22nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-13 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-13 06:23 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-13 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  5. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  6. 2026-10-12 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 21:53 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 21:53 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-11 21:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  10. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  14. 2026-10-11 09:53 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-11 09:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  16. 2026-10-10 20:06 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-10 20:06 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-10 20:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  19. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  20. 2026-10-10 07:59 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-10 07:59 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-10 07:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  23. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  24. 2026-10-09 19:25 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-09 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-08 23:28 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-08 23:28 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-08 23:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  4. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  5. 2026-10-08 07:47 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-08 07:47 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-08 07:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  8. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  9. 2026-10-07 19:46 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-07 19:46 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  11. 2026-10-07 04:29 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-07 04:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  13. 2026-10-06 16:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-06 16:29 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-06 16:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  16. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  17. 2026-10-06 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-06 04:28 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-10-06 04:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  20. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 21st percentile
  21. 2026-10-05 16:22 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-05 16:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  23. 2026-10-05 04:00 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-05 04:00 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-05 04:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  26. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  27. 2026-10-04 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-04 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  29. 2026-10-04 03:58 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-04 03:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  31. 2026-10-03 15:53 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-10-03 15:53 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-10-03 15:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  34. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  35. 2026-10-03 03:27 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-03 03:27 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-03 03:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  38. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  39. 2026-10-02 15:27 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-02 15:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  41. 2026-10-02 03:25 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-10-02 03:25 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-02 03:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  44. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  45. 2026-10-01 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-01 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  47. 2026-10-01 03:07 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-10-01 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  49. 2026-09-30 15:07 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-30 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-30 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  52. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  53. 2026-09-30 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-30 03:07 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-30 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  56. 2026-09-29 15:08 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-29 15:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  58. 2026-09-29 03:07 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-29 03:07 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-29 03:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  61. 2026-09-28 15:05 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-28 15:05 UTCVendor advisory
  63. 2026-09-28 15:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  64. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  65. 2026-09-28 03:02 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-28 03:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  67. 2026-09-27 15:02 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-27 15:02 UTCVendor advisory
  69. 2026-09-27 15:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  70. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  71. 2026-09-27 02:58 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-27 02:58 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-27 02:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-5r93-38xq-57mx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.1
  74. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 40th percentile
  75. 2026-09-26 14:57 UTCVendor advisory

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-81003?
CVE-2026-81003 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/iucv: filter frames in afiucvhsrcv() by ingress device afiucvhsrcv() selects a socket from iucvsklist by matching four 8-byte name fields in the transport header alone. No check is made against the net_device the frame arrived…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-81003 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-81003 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-81003 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-81003 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.3% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (22nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-81003?
CVE-2026-81003 has a CVSS base score of 8.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-81003?
A fix for CVE-2026-81003 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-81003 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-81003

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-81003?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.