CVE-2026-80970

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ALSA: FCP: do not copy out an uninitialised init response

fcp_ioctl_init() allocates its response buffer with kmalloc() and copies the whole buffer back to userspace:

buf_size = init.step0_resp_size + init.step2_resp_size;

void *resp __free(kfree) = kmalloc(buf_size, GFP_KERNEL); ... if (copy_to_user(arg->resp, resp, buf_size)) return -EFAULT;

Nothing clears the buffer, and the only writer of its leading step0_resp_size bytes is the step-0 control transfer:

err = snd_usb_ctl_msg(dev, usb_rcvctrlpipe(dev, 0), FCP_USB_REQ_STEP0, USB_RECIP_INTERFACE | USB_TYPE_CLASS | USB_DIR_IN, 0, private->bInterfaceNumber, step0_resp, private->step0_resp_size); if (err < 0) return err;

usb_fill_control_urb() does not set URB_SHORT_NOT_OK, so a short or zero-length data stage completes with status 0 and snd_usb_ctl_msg() returns a small actual_length. The only check is err < 0, so a short transfer is accepted as success.

snd_usb_ctl_msg() copies the full size back unconditionally:

buf = kmemdup(data, size, GFP_KERNEL); ... memcpy(data, buf, size);

Bytes the device never wrote are therefore restored into resp unchanged and copied to userspace. step0_resp_size and step2_resp_size are each validated only to 1..255, so the caller also picks the slab cache, from kmalloc-8 up to kmalloc-512.

On 7.2.0-rc5 (arm64), device answering step 0 with a zero-length data stage, s0 = s2 = 255:

# init_on_alloc off, no spray step0 window [0,255): nonzero=94/255 000: 00 80 60 06 00 00 ff ff 18 00 00 00 57 01 ea 01 010: 08 78 22 13 00 00 ff ff a8 c4 5f 80 00 80 ff ff

# same kernel, kmalloc-512 pre-seeded with an 8-byte tag step0 window [0,255): nonzero=219/255 tagbytes=232

# identical run, init_on_alloc=1 step0 window [0,255): nonzero=0/255 tagbytes=0

# all three runs step2 window [255,510): device words matched=62/62

a8 c4 5f 80 00 80 ff ff is the little-endian kernel text address ffff8000805fc4a8. The step-2 window is unaffected, so the disclosure is exactly the step-0 region.

Zero the buffer, and require the step-0 transfer to deliver the full step0_resp_size bytes so a short data stage is reported as an error.

Discovered by XBOW, triaged by Baul Lee

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
9th
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 11, 2026

Last Modified

September 14, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80970(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (178 versions)
  • every version up to 7.2.6-1: fixed in 7.2.6-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 50 is merged into the row it repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 00:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  10. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 04:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  14. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-10-04 08:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  18. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  20. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  21. 2026-10-01 12:53 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-01 12:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  23. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  24. 2026-09-28 17:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  25. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
Show 24 more
  1. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  2. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  3. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  4. 2026-09-25 21:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  5. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  6. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  7. 2026-09-23 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  8. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  9. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  10. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  11. 2026-09-20 05:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  12. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-09-17 09:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  14. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  15. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-09-14 13:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  18. 2026-09-14 13:27 UTCNVD update
  19. 2026-09-14 12:32 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-14 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-x4cq-72c3-qv9j
  21. 2026-09-14 12:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  22. 2026-09-11 20:36 UTCNVD update
  23. 2026-09-11 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-11 19:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-80970?
CVE-2026-80970 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 11, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: FCP: do not copy out an uninitialised init response fcpioctlinit() allocates its response buffer with kmalloc() and copies the whole buffer back to userspace: bufsize = init.step0respsize + init.step2resp_size; void *resp…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-80970 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-80970 was published on September 11, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 14, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-80970 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80970 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (9th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80970?
A fix for CVE-2026-80970 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-80970 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-80970

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80970?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.