CVE-2026-80919

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 3 sources updated this week
—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex acquire in amdgpu_devcoredump_format

When dumping IB contents from a hung job, amdgpu_devcoredump_format() acquired the VM root PD's reservation via amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() and then, for each IB, called amdgpu_bo_reserve() on the BO backing the IB. Both reservations are reservation_ww_class_mutex objects and neither used a ww_acquire_ctx, which trips lockdep:

WARNING: possible recursive locking detected -------------------------------------------- kworker/u128:0 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88838b16e1f0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594/0x23f0 [amdgpu]

but task is already holding lock: ffff8882f82681f0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594/0x23f0 [amdgpu]

Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);

* DEADLOCK * May be due to missing lock nesting notation

Workqueue: events_unbound amdgpu_devcoredump_deferred_work [amdgpu] Call Trace: __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0 ww_mutex_lock amdgpu_bo_reserve amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594 [amdgpu] amdgpu_devcoredump_deferred_work+0xea [amdgpu]

The two reservations are on different BOs in the captured trace, so the splat is a lockdep-correctness warning, not an observed deadlock. It becomes a real self-deadlock whenever the IB BO shares its dma_resv with the root PD (the always-valid case, see amdgpu_vm_is_bo_always_valid()): amdgpu_bo_reserve(abo) re-acquires the same ww_mutex without a ticket and blocks forever. With amdgpu.gpu_recovery=0 the timeout handler refires every ~2 s and each invocation produces this splat, drowning the kernel ring buffer.

Now that amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() takes a drm_exec context, move the IB dumping into a separate helper that locks the root PD and every IB BO together in a single drm_exec ticket. DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES handles IB BOs that share a dma_resv (e.g. always-valid BOs, or two IBs backed by the same BO). Every lock is now a top-level acquire under one ww_acquire_ctx, so the recursive ww_mutex condition is gone, and the per-IB amdgpu_bo_reserve()/amdgpu_bo_unref() dance -- including a BO refcount leak on the amdgpu_bo_reserve() failure path -- is removed.

(cherry picked from commit d6bf4242731219ee08ce54c365631e395486651e)

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
8th
KEV
Not listed

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 9, 2026

Last Modified

September 9, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80919(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (170 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.12-1: fixed in 7.1.12-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 40× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 48 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  9. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 23:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  11. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  12. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  14. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  15. 2026-10-05 12:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  16. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  17. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  18. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  19. 2026-10-02 07:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  20. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  21. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  22. 2026-09-29 02:19 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-29 02:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  24. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  25. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
Show 21 more
  1. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  2. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  3. 2026-09-25 21:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  4. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 8th percentile
  5. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  6. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  7. 2026-09-22 13:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  8. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  9. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  10. 2026-09-19 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  11. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  12. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  13. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  14. 2026-09-16 03:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  15. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  16. 2026-09-12 22:22 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-12 22:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg
  18. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 4th percentile
  19. 2026-09-09 17:27 UTCNVD update
  20. 2026-09-09 16:29 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-09 16:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-80919?
CVE-2026-80919 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 9, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu: fix recursive wwmutex acquire in amdgpudevcoredump_format When dumping IB contents from a hung job, amdgpudevcoredumpformat() acquired the VM root PD's reservation via amdgpuvmlockbypasid() and then, for each IB, called…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-80919 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-80919 was published on September 9, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 9, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-80919 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80919 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (8th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80919?
A fix for CVE-2026-80919 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-80919 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-80919

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80919?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.