CVE-2026-80850

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asEUVD-2026-71300 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tcp: fix AO info use-after-free in tcp_ao_connect_init()

tcp_v4_connect() adds a SYN-SENT socket to the ehash before calling tcp_connect(). If TCP-AO is configured, tcp_connect() first verifies that a key matches the peer and the bound device's current L3 master. tcp_ao_connect_init() later resolves the L3 master again and removes keys which do not match it.

The socket lock does not stabilize the bound device's VRF membership. Detaching the device from its VRF between the initial validation and the L3-master calculation in tcp_ao_connect_init() can therefore make the validation succeed while initialization observes the default L3 domain and removes the only key. The subsequent AO lookup then fails, so the no-key path clears tp->ao_info and frees it directly.

The receive path can find the socket in the ehash and load tp->ao_info under RCU before acquiring the socket lock. A reader which loaded the old pointer can thus continue into tcp_inbound_ao_hash() after the direct free.

The issue was found during a static audit of TCP-AO object lifetime. An unprivileged reproducer in self-created user and network namespaces raced connect() with detaching a veth from its VRF while sending TCP-AO segments. It triggered the same KASAN report on two fresh boots:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in tcp_inbound_ao_hash+0x585/0x19f0 Write of size 8 at addr ffff88800bf88128 by task tcp_ao_vrf_race/232

Call Trace: tcp_inbound_ao_hash+0x585/0x19f0 tcp_inbound_hash+0x677/0xa80 tcp_v4_rcv+0x1c3e/0x3ab0

Allocated by task 235: tcp_ao_alloc_info+0x43/0xf0 tcp_ao_add_cmd+0xdf7/0x13b0 do_tcp_setsockopt+0x168c/0x2640

Freed by task 235: kfree+0x1b8/0x550 tcp_connect+0x252/0x4f00 tcp_v4_connect+0x1114/0x1720

The bad address is 40 bytes inside the freed 128-byte object, matching the tcp_ao_info counters.key_not_found field. The two runs used 1000 attempts each, reached the no-key path 366 and 411 times, and produced one and two KASAN reports respectively. With this change, the same reproducer reached the no-key path 366 times in 1000 attempts without a KASAN report or oops.

Use tcp_ao_destroy_sock() for the no-key path. It unpublishes the AO info, updates the socket memory and static-key accounting, and defers the free until after an RCU grace period.

Also drop the WARN_ON_ONCE() and its stale comment. The VRF detach race makes the no-key state reachable during normal operation, so it is a handled condition rather than an impossible assertion. On panic_on_warn kernels the WARN would turn this handled race into a kernel panic.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 4, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80850(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (172 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.13-1: fixed in 7.1.13-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 43× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 71 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-19 09:25 UTCNVD update
  11. 2026-10-19 09:23 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-19 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  13. 2026-10-19 08:58 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  14. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  15. 2026-10-18 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  17. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  21. 2026-10-12 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
Show 44 more
  1. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-07 23:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  6. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  9. 2026-10-04 13:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  10. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  11. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  12. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  13. 2026-10-01 13:29 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-01 13:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  15. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  16. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  17. 2026-09-28 13:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  18. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  20. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  21. 2026-09-25 14:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  22. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-09-22 14:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  26. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  27. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  28. 2026-09-19 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  29. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  30. 2026-09-16 15:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  31. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  32. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  33. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  34. 2026-09-13 15:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  35. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  36. 2026-09-10 15:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  37. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  38. 2026-09-07 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-07 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpgq-xw99-wp3q
  40. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  41. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  42. 2026-09-04 16:22 UTCNVD update
  43. 2026-09-04 16:05 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-04 16:04 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-80850?
CVE-2026-80850 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: fix AO info use-after-free in tcpaoconnect_init() tcpv4connect() adds a SYN-SENT socket to the ehash before calling tcpconnect(). If TCP-AO is configured, tcpconnect() first verifies that a key matches the peer and the bound…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-80850 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-80850 was published on September 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-80850 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80850 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80850?
A fix for CVE-2026-80850 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-80850 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-80850

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80850?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.