CVE-2026-80837

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scored

Also known asEUVD-2026-71287 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

—
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS v2: —Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: nf_tables: don't queue packet path object notifications

All file:line references below are against v7.2-rc4 (ac5b0e5651b1). The trace was captured on 7.2.0-rc6-kasan72rc6 (075b74841bd0), where the same lines apply.

nft_obj_notify() is exported and reached from the packet path. Its only in-tree caller is nft_quota_obj_eval() (net/netfilter/nft_quota.c:68), which notifies with GFP_ATOMIC while evaluating a rule for a transiting packet, holding no mutex.

Since commit 67cc570edaa0 ("netfilter: nf_tables: coalesce multiple notifications into one skbuff") that notification is no longer sent immediately. __nft_obj_notify() queues it onto nft_net->notify_list via nft_notify_enqueue() (net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:1211), which is a bare list_add_tail(). notify_list has no lock of its own (include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h:1951), it is serialised by commit_mutex: the six other enqueue sites all run inside a netlink transaction, and the drain in nft_commit_notify() (net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:10746) does list_del() + kfree_skb() from nf_tables_commit() with commit_mutex held.

Sending packets through a chain that references a depleted quota object therefore races an unlocked list_add_tail() against list_del() + kfree_skb() on another CPU. The WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, new) in __list_add() then stores through an sk_buff that has already been freed:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __nft_obj_notify+0x2c5/0x2d0 Write of size 8 at addr ff110001047183c0 by task poc/76 CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 76 Comm: poc Tainted: G W 7.2.0-rc6-kasan72rc6 #4 Call Trace: __nft_obj_notify (include/linux/list.h:164 include/linux/list.h:191 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:1211 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:8743) nft_quota_obj_eval (net/netfilter/nft_quota.c:68) nft_do_chain_inet nf_hook_slow __ip_local_out ip_push_pending_frames udp_send_skb udp_sendmsg __x64_sys_sendto

Allocated by task 77: __alloc_skb (net/core/skbuff.c:704) __nft_obj_notify (include/net/netlink.h:1055 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:8731) nft_quota_obj_eval (net/netfilter/nft_quota.c:68) nft_do_chain

Freed by task 79: nf_tables_commit (include/linux/skbuff.h:1332 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:10759 net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c:11185) nfnetlink_rcv_batch (net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:574) netlink_unicast netlink_sendmsg

The buggy address belongs to the cache skbuff_head_cache of size 232

Queueing from the packet path is wrong even leaving the race aside: notify_list is only drained by nft_commit_notify() from nf_tables_commit() (:11185), so a notification enqueued outside a transaction is not sent until some later netlink batch commits, if one ever does.

The gfp argument that nft_obj_notify() still takes is a leftover of the pre-67cc570edaa0 behaviour, where this path called nfnetlink_send() directly. Restore that: split the message construction out into nft_obj_notify_alloc() and let each caller decide what to do with the skb. nft_obj_notify(), the exported one reached from the packet path, sends it straight away; nf_tables_obj_notify(), which runs under commit_mutex, keeps queueing it, so transaction notifications are still coalesced.

CVSS v3
—
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
—
EG Risk
—
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

EG Severity
Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

September 4, 2026

Last Modified

October 19, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80837(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (360 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1, 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (35 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.111-1: fixed in 6.12.111-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (172 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.13-1: fixed in 7.1.13-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 52× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 81 are merged into the row they repeat.

  1. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-25 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-19 09:25 UTCNVD update
  11. 2026-10-19 09:23 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-19 09:23 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-19 09:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  14. 2026-10-19 08:58 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  15. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  16. 2026-10-18 03:09 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  23. 2026-10-12 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
Show 54 more
  1. 2026-10-11 13:55 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-09 23:08 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-09 23:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  5. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-06 13:27 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-06 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  11. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 10th percentile
  13. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 11:34 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-03 11:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  16. 2026-10-03 11:26 UTCNVD update
  17. 2026-10-03 11:10 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  18. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  19. 2026-10-02 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-02 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  21. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  22. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  23. 2026-09-29 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-29 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-29 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  26. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  27. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  28. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  29. 2026-09-26 06:39 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-09-26 06:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  31. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  32. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 9th percentile
  33. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  34. 2026-09-23 03:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  35. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  36. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  37. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  38. 2026-09-20 01:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  39. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  40. 2026-09-16 23:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  41. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  42. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  43. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  44. 2026-09-13 22:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  45. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  46. 2026-09-10 20:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  47. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  48. 2026-09-07 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-07 18:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cj8h-w72f-5pwh
  50. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  51. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  52. 2026-09-04 16:22 UTCNVD update
  53. 2026-09-04 16:05 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-04 16:04 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-80837?
CVE-2026-80837 is a vulnerability whose severity is not yet rated; its CVE record was published on September 4, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nf_tables: don't queue packet path object notifications All file:line references below are against v7.2-rc4 (ac5b0e5651b1). The trace was captured on 7.2.0-rc6-kasan72rc6 (075b74841bd0), where the same lines apply.…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-80837 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-80837 was published on September 4, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 19, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-80837 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80837 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80837?
A fix for CVE-2026-80837 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-80837 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-80837

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80837?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.