In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Bluetooth: hci_sync: Fix accept list UAF during suspend
hci_update_event_filter_sync() walks hdev->accept_list while sending a
synchronous HCI command for each remote-wakeup device. The suspend path
holds hdev->req_lock, but accept-list updates are serialized by hdev->lock.
Consequently, remove_device() can free the current list entry during the
controller wait.
The following interleaving causes the use-after-free:
hci_update_event_filter_sync() remove_device()
fetch accept-list entry
hci_set_event_filter_sync()
wait for controller response hci_dev_lock()
list_del()
kfree()
hci_dev_unlock()
read the freed list.next
KASAN reported:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in hci_suspend_sync+0x835/0x910
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810bec8440 by task kworker/0:1/10
Workqueue: events vhci_suspend_work
Call Trace:
hci_suspend_sync+0x835/0x910
hci_suspend_dev+0x182/0x450
process_one_work+0x661/0x1090
worker_thread+0x45b/0xd10
Allocated by task 86:
hci_bdaddr_list_add_with_flags+0x1a8/0x400
add_device+0x381/0x820
hci_sock_sendmsg+0x1033/0x1ea0
Freed by task 91:
kfree+0x131/0x3c0
remove_device+0x429/0xb70
hci_sock_sendmsg+0x1033/0x1ea0
Snapshot the remote-wakeup addresses under hdev->lock. Release the lock
before sending HCI commands. Clear the controller event filter before
building the snapshot, and skip allocation and the second list traversal
when there are no matching entries. This preserves the original filter
and scan-state updates without retaining an accept-list node across a
controller wait.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it