In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/vmwgfx: enforce cursor size limits for MOB cursors
vmw_cursor_plane_atomic_check() bounds cursor width and height only
on the legacy update path; the SVGA_CAP2_CURSOR_MOB path -- the
default on modern hosts -- accepts any size. When the requested size
exceeds SVGA_REG_CURSOR_MAX_DIMENSION or SVGA_REG_MOB_MAX_SIZE,
vmw_cursor_mob_get() returns -EINVAL and leaves vps->cursor.mob NULL.
Its return value is then discarded in vmw_cursor_plane_prepare_fb(),
so the subsequent vmw_cursor_update_mob() calls
vmw_bo_map_and_cache(NULL) and oopses inside
vmw_bo_map_and_cache_size() on the tbo.base.size load.
Reachable from any DRM master via DRM_IOCTL_MODE_CURSOR2 with a
sufficiently large width or height (e.g. cursor_max_dim + 1).
Reject oversized cursors in atomic_check for both MOB-backed cursor
update types. The MOB byte-size limit only applies to the
SVGA_CAP2_CURSOR_MOB path (vmw_cursor_mob_size() returns 0 for
GB_ONLY); compute the required MOB size in 64-bit to avoid overflow
when very large dimensions are requested.
In prepare_fb only call vmw_cursor_mob_get()/_map() for
VMW_CURSOR_UPDATE_MOB -- the GB_ONLY path uses bo->map.virtual
directly and would otherwise be silently downgraded to NONE on hosts
without SVGA_CAP2_CURSOR_MOB (where vmw_cursor_mob_get() always
returns -EINVAL). Degrade the update to NONE if vmw_cursor_mob_get()
or vmw_cursor_mob_map() fails so the update path does not run with a
NULL backing MOB.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it