CVE-2026-80659

UNRATEDCVSS · not yet scoredTrending — 4 sources updated this week
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • No CVSS published and no exploitation signals yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS v2: Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mmc: vub300: defer reset until cmd_mutex is unlocked

vub300_cmndwork_thread() holds cmd_mutex while it sends a command and waits for the command response. If the response wait times out, __vub300_command_response() kills the command URBs and then synchronously resets the USB device through usb_reset_device().

That reset path re-enters the driver through vub300_pre_reset(), which also takes cmd_mutex. The worker therefore tries to acquire the same mutex recursively while it is still holding it from the command path.

This issue was found by our static analysis tool and then manually reviewed against the current tree.

The grounded PoC kept the real worker and timeout/reset carrier:

vub300_cmndwork_thread() __vub300_command_response() usb_lock_device_for_reset() usb_reset_device() vub300_pre_reset()

Lockdep reported the same-task recursive acquisition on cmd_mutex:

WARNING: possible recursive locking detected ... (&test_vub300.cmd_mutex) ... at: usb_reset_device... [vuln_msv] ... (&test_vub300.cmd_mutex) ... at: vub300_cmndwork_thread+0x12/0x20 [vuln_msv] Workqueue: vub300_cmd_wq vub300_cmndwork_thread [vuln_msv] * DEADLOCK *

Return a flag from __vub300_command_response() when the timeout path needs a device reset, then perform the reset after vub300_cmndwork_thread() has cleared the in-flight command state and dropped cmd_mutex. The reset is still attempted before mmc_request_done(), preserving the existing request completion ordering while avoiding the recursive lock.

CVSS v3
EchelonGraph score
Not yet assessedNo source has published severity data for this CVE yet — no CVSS score from NVD or a CNA, no GitHub advisory, and it is not in CISA KEV. This is not a rating of zero; we cannot assess it yet.
EG Score
EG Risk
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
8%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 28, 2026

Last Modified

August 28, 2026

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80659(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 5× in last 7d / 5× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-28 08:20 UTCNVD update
  4. 2026-08-28 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-28 07:32 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-80659?
CVE-2026-80659 is a publicly disclosed vulnerability published on August 28, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mmc: vub300: defer reset until cmd_mutex is unlocked vub300cmndworkthread() holds cmd_mutex while it sends a command and waits for the command response. If the response wait times out, vub300commandresponse() kills the command URBs…
When was CVE-2026-80659 disclosed?
CVE-2026-80659 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 28, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-80659 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80659 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 92.4% of all scored CVEs.
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80659?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-80659, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-80659

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80659?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.