In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: hisi_sas: Add slave_destroy interface for v3 hw
WARNING is triggered when executing link reset of remote PHY and rmmod
SAS driver simultaneously. Following is the WARNING log:
WARNING: CPU: 61 PID: 21818 at drivers/base/core.c:1347 __device_links_no_driver+0xb4/0xc0
Call trace:
__device_links_no_driver+0xb4/0xc0
device_links_driver_cleanup+0xb0/0xfc
__device_release_driver+0x198/0x23c
device_release_driver+0x38/0x50
bus_remove_device+0x130/0x140
device_del+0x184/0x434
__scsi_remove_device+0x118/0x150
scsi_remove_target+0x1bc/0x240
sas_rphy_remove+0x90/0x94
sas_rphy_delete+0x24/0x3c
sas_destruct_devices+0x64/0xa0 [libsas]
sas_revalidate_domain+0xe4/0x150 [libsas]
process_one_work+0x1e0/0x46c
worker_thread+0x15c/0x464
kthread+0x160/0x170
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
---[ end trace 71e059eb58f85d4a ]---
During SAS phy up, link->status is set to DL_STATE_AVAILABLE in
device_links_driver_bound, then this setting influences
__device_links_no_driver() before driver rmmod and caused WARNING.
Add the slave_destroy interface to make sure link is removed after flush
workque.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (8.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 8.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-29). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it