CVE-2026-80615

HIGHPre-NVD 8.28.2
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 8.2 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-28. a secondary CVSS source baseline 8.2; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
8.2EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 8.2Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net: dst_metadata: fix false-positive memcpy overflow in tun_dst_unclone

kmalloc_flex() in metadata_dst_alloc() sets __counted_by for the structure to the options_len, which is then initialized to zero. Later, we're initializing the structure by copying the tunnel info together with the options, and this triggers a warning for a potential memcpy overflow, since the compiler estimates that the options can't fit into the structure, even though the memory for them is actually allocated.

memcpy: detected buffer overflow: 104 byte write of buffer size 96 WARNING: CPU: X PID: Y at lib/string_helpers.c:1036 __fortify_report skb_tunnel_info_unclone+0x179/0x190 geneve_xmit+0x7fe/0xe00

The issue is triggered when built with clang and source fortification.

Fix that by doing the copy in two stages: first - the main data with the options_len, then the options. This way the correct length should be known at the time of the copy.

It would be better if the options_len never changed after allocation, but the allocation code is a little separate from the initialization and it would be awkward and potentially dangerous to return a struct with options_len set to a non-zero value from the metadata_dst_alloc().

Another option would be to use ip_tunnel_info_opts_set(), but it is doing too many unnecessary operations for the use case here.

CVSS v3
8.2
EG Score
8.2(high)
EG Risk
42(Track)
EG Risk 42/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity82% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
28%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 28, 2026

Last Modified

August 29, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 29, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net: dst_metadata: fix false-positive memcpy overflow in tun_dst_unclone - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c6d43db2a4d2cef3921e885cf34798f790d34ea
generic

net: dst_metadata: fix false-positive memcpy overflow in tun_dst_unclone - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7ce31739fe88a558370135db95bbeec1e7ddfc29

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80615(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 14× in last 7d / 14× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 06:31 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 06:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-29 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-29 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-29 07:27 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-29 07:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-29 06:37 UTCEG score recompute 8.20
  9. 2026-08-29 06:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-29 06:33 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.2 · severity → HIGH
  11. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-28 08:20 UTCNVD update
  13. 2026-08-28 07:36 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-28 07:32 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-80615?
CVE-2026-80615 is a high vulnerability published on August 28, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dstmetadata: fix false-positive memcpy overflow in tundst_unclone kmallocflex() in metadatadstalloc() sets countedby for the structure to the options_len, which is then initialized to zero. Later, we're initializing the…
When was CVE-2026-80615 disclosed?
CVE-2026-80615 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 28, 2026, with the most recent update on August 29, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-80615 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80615 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 72.1% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-80615?
CVE-2026-80615 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.2 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80615?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-80615, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-80615

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80615?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.