CVE-2026-80575

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space

cs40l50_add() copies the custom data of an FF_PERIODIC/FF_CUSTOM effect straight from the ff_effect the user passed to EVIOCSFF, without requiring it to hold anything:

work_data.custom_data = memdup_array_user(periodic->custom_data, periodic->custom_len, sizeof(s16)); work_data.custom_len = periodic->custom_len;

The driver then reads two words out of that buffer: custom_data[0] as the waveform bank in cs40l50_effect_bank_set(), and custom_data[1] as the index within the bank in cs40l50_effect_index_set(). Neither read is covered by a length check, and custom_len is fully user controlled:

  • custom_len == 0 makes memdup_array_user() call memdup_user() with a
length of zero, which returns ZERO_SIZE_PTR rather than an error, so custom_data[0] dereferences it.
  • custom_len == 1 allocates two bytes. A bank of ROM or RAM keeps
effect->type out of the OWT case, and custom_data[1] is then read one word past the allocation.

The bank value itself is also mishandled. It is masked with CS40L50_CUSTOM_DATA_MASK (0xffff) but stored in an s16, so a custom_data[0] of 0x8000 or above wraps to a negative value that passes the "bank_type >= CS40L50_WVFRM_BANK_NUM" test. cs40l50_effect_index_set() indexes vib->dsp.banks[] with it before the switch statement's default case gets a chance to reject it:

base_index = vib->dsp.banks[effect->type].base_index; max_index = vib->dsp.banks[effect->type].max_index;

Require the two words the driver reads to be present, and hold the masked bank in a u32 so the existing upper-bound test covers the whole range. The da7280 haptic driver already range checks custom_len this way.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 26, 2026

Last Modified

August 27, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d5c576cb1c86047b1fcb1aa9532e17fc5e46c1d
generic

Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d38554602a0b04e85fad28ce72c7500cf50d419b
generic

Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/52a818c586ae2c36b7324bfaefb547f5e866a8ae
generic

Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3855b6a11f8a7aceb8181cc08c99afef58517006

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80575(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 15× in last 7d / 15× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 06:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-29 18:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-29 06:08 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-29 06:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-28 18:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-28 06:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-27 18:14 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-27 18:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-27 06:18 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  12. 2026-08-27 06:11 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  13. 2026-08-26 15:43 UTCNVD update
  14. 2026-08-26 14:42 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-80575?
CVE-2026-80575 is a high vulnerability published on August 26, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: cs40l50-vibra - validate custom data from user space cs40l50add() copies the custom data of an FFPERIODIC/FF_CUSTOM effect straight from the ff_effect the user passed to EVIOCSFF, without requiring it to hold anything:…
When was CVE-2026-80575 disclosed?
CVE-2026-80575 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 26, 2026, with the most recent update on August 27, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-80575 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80575 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 98.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-80575?
CVE-2026-80575 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80575?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-80575, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-80575

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80575?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.