CVE-2026-80158

MEDIUMPre-NVD 5.55.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 5.5 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-27. The CNA's CVSS baseline 5.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: the CNA's CVSS, EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory

Also known asEUVD-2026-66808 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

5.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 5.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

No fix is confirmed yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for the fix.

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw ), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

CVSS v3
5.5
EG Score
5.5MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
25
EG Risk 25/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity55% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 5.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at every mission impact level.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
3rd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (5.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 5.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
5.5 MEDIUMCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-24). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at every mission impact level.CISA BOD 26-04: 60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at every mission impact level.

No fix is confirmed yet. Restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation within your standard update timelines, and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 26, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 26, 2026
No fix on record yet. Sources: redhat.
Red Hat

2524651 – (CVE-2026-80158) CVE-2026-80158 ansible-collection-community-general: community.general: ipa_getkeytab does not set no_log on the bind_pw parameter, disclosing the IPA bind password in logs and process listings

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2524651
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-80158 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-80158

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80158(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
ansible10.0.0+dfsg-1 ... 9.5.1+dfsg-1 (30 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
ansible12.0.0+dfsg-0+deb13u1 ... 14.4.0+dfsg-1 (14 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
ansible12.0.0+dfsg-1 ... 14.4.0+dfsg-1 (12 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 55× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 149 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 50 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  2. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-25 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  9. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-18 03:10 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-16 11:59 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-16 11:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  19. 2026-10-15 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  21. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  22. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  23. 2026-10-12 14:57 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-11 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  3. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  4. 2026-10-10 06:02 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-10 06:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  6. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-09 03:19 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-09 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  9. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  10. 2026-10-08 01:44 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-08 01:43 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  12. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-06 17:47 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-06 17:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  15. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  16. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  17. 2026-10-05 17:13 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-05 17:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  19. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  20. 2026-10-04 16:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  21. 2026-10-03 16:05 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-03 16:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  23. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  24. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  25. 2026-10-02 07:08 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-10-02 07:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  27. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  28. 2026-10-01 06:33 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-01 06:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  30. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  31. 2026-09-30 05:59 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-30 05:59 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  33. 2026-09-28 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-28 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  35. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  36. 2026-09-27 21:04 UTCEG score recompute
  37. 2026-09-27 21:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  38. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  39. 2026-09-26 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-26 20:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  41. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  42. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  43. 2026-09-25 00:58 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-25 00:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  45. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 3rd percentile
  46. 2026-09-24 00:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  47. 2026-09-22 23:49 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-22 23:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  49. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  50. 2026-09-21 23:14 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-21 23:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  52. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  53. 2026-09-20 22:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  54. 2026-09-19 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-19 22:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  56. 2026-09-18 21:31 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-18 21:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  58. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  59. 2026-09-17 20:57 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-17 20:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  61. 2026-09-16 19:06 UTCEG score recompute
  62. 2026-09-16 19:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  63. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  64. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  65. 2026-09-15 16:04 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-15 16:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  67. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile
  68. 2026-09-14 15:30 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-14 15:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  70. 2026-09-13 14:56 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-13 14:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  72. 2026-09-12 14:15 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-12 14:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4m5f-rh76-cv72 · GitHub CVSS 5.5
  74. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 1st percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-80158?
CVE-2026-80158 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 26, 2026. A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bindpw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with nolog, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a…
When was CVE-2026-80158 made public?
CVE-2026-80158 was made public on August 26, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 26, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-80158 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80158 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (3rd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-80158?
CVE-2026-80158 has a CVSS base score of 5.5 (the CNA's own assessment, by redhat; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80158?
No fix for CVE-2026-80158 is confirmed yet. Until one is published, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation — for example, keep it off the internet or limit it to trusted networks — and watch the vendor's advisory for the fix. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-80158 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-80158

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80158?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.