CVE-2026-80101

MEDIUMPre-NVD 4.44.4
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 4.4 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-08-25. A secondary CVSS source baseline 4.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated
4.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 4.4Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

A flaw was found in the file-xwd plugin in GIMP. When processing a specially crafted XWD image file, the plugin validates the image width and bytes-per-line parameters independently rather than ensuring their combined values are consistent with the allocated buffer size. This incorrect validation leads to improper bounds checking, causing a heap out-of-bounds read. This issue can result in an application crash, leading to a denial of service or a limited information disclosure of heap memory contents into the produced image.

CVSS v3
4.4
EG Score
4.4MEDIUMmedium confidence
EG Risk
36
EG Risk 36/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity44% × 45%
The EG Score, 4.4 of 10.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
13th
KEV
Not listed

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)60 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 25, 2026

Last Modified

September 2, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available. Sources: redhat.
Web page

Multiple heap out-of-bounds reads in XWD loader from unrelated width and bytes-per-line validation (#16583) · Issues · GNOME / GIMP · GitLab

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/work_items/16583
Red HatMentions a patch (unverified)

CVE-2026-80101 - Red Hat Customer Portal

Affected: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 or OpenShift Container Platform 4, is affected by this vulnerability and a fix may be released to a

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-80101

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-80101(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gimp2.10.34-1 ... 3.2.6-1 (57 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gimp3.0.4-3 ... 3.2.6-1 (31 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
gimp3.0.4-3 ... 3.2.4-3 (19 versions)
  • every version up to 3.2.6-1: fixed in 3.2.6-1
—

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 17× in last 7d / 78× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 98 of 138 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 2 repeat rows among the latest 100 are merged into the row they repeat. The 40 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  2. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  3. 2026-10-12 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-11 19:21 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-11 16:37 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-11 13:56 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  8. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  9. 2026-10-10 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-10 11:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  12. 2026-10-09 07:52 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-09 07:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  14. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  15. 2026-10-08 05:40 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-08 05:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  17. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  18. 2026-10-07 03:48 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-07 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  20. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  21. 2026-10-06 01:51 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-06 01:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  23. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  24. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  25. 2026-10-04 19:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
Show 73 more
  1. 2026-10-03 16:17 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-03 16:17 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  3. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  4. 2026-10-02 17:57 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  5. 2026-10-02 10:04 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-02 10:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  7. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  8. 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-01 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  10. 2026-09-30 15:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  11. 2026-09-30 06:22 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-09-30 06:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  13. 2026-09-29 01:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-09-29 01:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  15. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  16. 2026-09-27 23:29 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-09-27 23:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  18. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  19. 2026-09-26 21:38 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-26 21:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  21. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  22. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  23. 2026-09-25 10:07 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-09-25 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  25. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.3% · 15th percentile
  26. 2026-09-24 08:16 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-24 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  28. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  29. 2026-09-23 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-23 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  31. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  32. 2026-09-22 04:34 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-22 04:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  34. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  35. 2026-09-21 02:42 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-21 02:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  37. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  38. 2026-09-20 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-20 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  40. 2026-09-18 22:57 UTCEG score recompute
  41. 2026-09-18 22:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  42. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  43. 2026-09-17 21:05 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-17 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  45. 2026-09-16 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-16 19:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  47. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 14th percentile
  48. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  49. 2026-09-15 17:05 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-15 17:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  51. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  52. 2026-09-14 15:13 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-14 15:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  54. 2026-09-13 13:22 UTCEG score recompute
  55. 2026-09-13 13:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  56. 2026-09-12 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-12 11:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  58. 2026-09-11 14:53 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  59. 2026-09-11 09:39 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-11 09:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  61. 2026-09-10 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  62. 2026-09-09 05:56 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-09 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  64. 2026-09-08 22:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  65. 2026-09-08 04:05 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-08 04:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  67. 2026-09-07 02:14 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-07 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  69. 2026-09-06 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  70. 2026-09-06 00:14 UTCEG score recompute
  71. 2026-09-06 00:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r338-8qhf-wvrr · GitHub CVSS 4.4
  72. 2026-09-05 15:31 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 13th percentile
  73. 2026-09-04 22:23 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-80101?
CVE-2026-80101 is a medium-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 25, 2026. A flaw was found in the file-xwd plugin in GIMP. When processing a specially crafted XWD image file, the plugin validates the image width and bytes-per-line parameters independently rather than ensuring their combined values are consistent with the allocated buffer size. This incorrect validation…
When was CVE-2026-80101 made public?
CVE-2026-80101 was made public on July 24, 2026: that is the date its CVE record's CNA, Red Hat, Inc., gives for when the vulnerability was made public. The CVE record itself was published on August 25, 2026. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of September 2, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-80101 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-80101 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (13th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-80101?
CVE-2026-80101 has a CVSS base score of 4.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-80101?
A fix for CVE-2026-80101 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-80101 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-80101

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-80101?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.