CVE-2026-79985

HIGHPre-NVD 7.47.4
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-104217 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 7.4Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation) — apply it.

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel SMB component.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.2.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.

The Camel remote-file consumers poll a directory on a remote server and build the absolute remote path of each file by concatenating the configured directory with the file name reported in the server's directory listing. That concatenation (FtpUtils.absoluteFilePath and GenericFileConsumer) applied no lexical normalization and no check that the result stayed inside the directory being polled, and the resulting path became the operand for every subsequent remote operation on the file: retrieval (FtpOperations.retrieveFile / SftpOperations, reached from GenericFileConsumer where the retrieve name is taken verbatim from GenericFile.getAbsoluteFilePath), deletion when delete=true (GenericFileDeleteProcessStrategy), and renaming when move, preMove, moveFailed or readLock=rename is configured (GenericFileProcessStrategySupport and GenericFileRenameExclusiveReadLockStrategy). Neither isValidFile nor isMatched performed any containment check. A listing entry that is not a single path segment therefore resolved to a path outside the configured polling directory, causing Camel to read, delete or rename files outside it using the endpoint's own credentials. A listing name is not route-controlled data. It is supplied by the remote server, and the FTP control channel carries no integrity protection at all, so an on-path attacker can rewrite a LIST response without holding any credentials; a compromised, malicious or multi-tenant server, or a server backed by a virtual filesystem, can emit such a name directly. Retrieval is reachable in a default consumer configuration, since the remote consumers download every listed file; deletion and renaming additionally require one of the disposition options above, all of which are common. Escape from the directory Camel was configured to poll is unconditional, while escape from the server's own account boundary additionally depends on whether that server confines the account. The jailStartingDirectory option, which is documented as restricting Camel to the starting directory and is enabled by default, governed producer writes and, since the localWorkDirectory containment work, consumer downloads to the local work directory - but it did not constrain this remote operand, so its name and description claimed a boundary that was not enforced here. The same entry point had already been recognised on the local side: the localWorkDirectory download path was constrained so that a remote file name containing parent-directory segments could not resolve outside the local work directory. The remote operand was the remaining half of that surface. This artifact provides the smb scheme. Its consumer walks the share listing on its own rather than through RemoteFileConsumer, skipping only the exact "." and ".." entries, so a name carrying traversal segments in any other form was concatenated unchecked. Reaching it requires a server that emits a listing name which is not a single path segment, which a conforming SMB2 implementation does not do; the exposure was corrected on the same basis as the other remote-file consumers rather than from a demonstrated proof of concept against this scheme.

Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x stream reached end of life and does not receive this fix; users on it should move to a supported releases stream.

CVSS v3
7.4
EG Score
7.4HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity74% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.4 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
51st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.4): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.4 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.4 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 20, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Apache Software Foundation). Sources: github_pr.
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24487: sync the remote-file consumer containment note to the 4.22/4.18 upgrade guides

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25747 on 2026-08-26 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25747
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.18.x] CAMEL-24487: remote-file consumers - contain remote operations within the configured directory

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25746 on 2026-08-26 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25746
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.22.x] CAMEL-24487: remote-file consumers - contain remote operations within the configured directory

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25745 on 2026-08-26 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25745
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24487: remote-file consumers - contain remote operations within the configured directory

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25730 on 2026-08-25 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25730
Web page

[CAMEL-24487] camel-ftp/sftp/mina-sftp/azure-files/smb: contain remote consumer operations within the configured directory - ASF Jira

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24487
Web page🟡 PoC Available

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-79985 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-79985.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-79985(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  2. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  3. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  4. 2026-10-28 05:20 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-28 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  6. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  7. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 13:59 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  11. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  12. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  13. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 43rd percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 42nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-20 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-20 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  17. 2026-10-20 13:28 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-20 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  19. 2026-10-20 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-20 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  21. 2026-10-20 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-20 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  23. 2026-10-19 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  24. 2026-10-19 19:35 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-19 19:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
Show 5 more
  1. 2026-10-19 18:50 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-19 18:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cpwx-4xfv-48r6 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.4
  3. 2026-10-19 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 7.4 HIGH
  5. 2026-10-19 10:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-79985?
CVE-2026-79985 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 19, 2026. Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache Camel SMB component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.2.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. The Camel remote-file consumers poll a directory on a remote server and build the…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-79985 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-79985 was published on October 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 20, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-79985 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-79985 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-79985?
CVE-2026-79985 has a CVSS base score of 7.4 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-79985?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2026-79985, written by its CNA Apache Software Foundation, names the fix: "Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-79985 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-79985

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-79985?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.