CVE-2026-78165

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 8.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-10-19. A secondary CVSS source baseline 8.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this weekElevated

Also known asEUVD-2026-104221 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7 (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • CISA's Vulnrichment rates exploitation as PoC; EchelonGraph holds no exploit-code reference for it
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: No code on recordExposed services: Not assessed

Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation) — apply it.

Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel Spring Redis component.

This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.11.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1.

RedisConfiguration.getSerializer lazily built a bare JdkSerializationRedisSerializer whenever no serializer option was configured, and that instance was used for every read the component performs. Spring's implementation delegates through DeserializingConverter to DefaultDeserializer, which reads the bytes with a ConfigurableObjectInputStream and installs no java.io.ObjectInputFilter on the stream, so an arbitrary serialized class graph was materialised and its readObject method executed. RedisConsumer.setBody applied that serializer to the raw bytes of every message published to the subscribed channels, before the Exchange was constructed and therefore before any route logic could inspect the message, so an actor able to issue PUBLISH on a subscribed channel reached the deserialization sink directly. The same default serializer backed the RedisTemplate built by RedisConfiguration.createDefaultTemplate, so the producer read commands GET, HGET, HGETALL and HVALS deserialized whatever was stored in the Redis keyspace, and SpringRedisIdempotentRepository shared that template. Configuring a custom redisTemplate did not close the consumer path, because RedisConsumer.setBody reads getSerializer directly rather than the serializer attached to the template, so a deployment that had wired a String serializer into its own template remained exposed on the consumer side unless it also set the serializer option. The component never constructed a java.io.ObjectInputStream itself, which is why earlier passes over the Camel codebase for unfiltered Java deserialization did not reach it. The behaviour dates back to the introduction of the component, first released in 2.11.0, and was unchanged until this fix.

Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.22.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.22.1. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.5. The 4.14.x releases stream and earlier reached end of life before this issue was resolved and will not receive a fix, so deployments on those lines must move to a supported release. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, set the JVM-wide jdk.serialFilter system property, which the affected code path honours because it reads through a java.io.ObjectInputStream, for example -Djdk.serialFilter=!java.net.;java.;javax.;org.apache.camel.;!* ; or set the serializer endpoint option to a serializer that does not use Java serialization, such as StringRedisSerializer, noting that this must be set as the serializer option and not only on a custom redisTemplate. As defence in depth, require authentication on the Redis instance and restrict which clients may publish to the subscribed channels, and do not expose a Redis instance consumed by Camel to untrusted networks.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHhigh confidence
EG Risk
56
EG Risk 56/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation40% × 40%
EchelonGraph's fixed weight for EG-KEV Tier 3 (Elevated): a constant, not a probability.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.
Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
54th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-27). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track* at medium mission impactTrack at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low, Track* at medium and Attend at high mission impact.

Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1 (from the CVE record's solution, Apache Software Foundation). Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation public PoC (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 19, 2026

Last Modified

October 20, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Oct 19, 2026
Fix named in the CVE record's solution (Apache Software Foundation). Sources: github_pr.
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24421: add the spring-redis deserialization-filter notes to the 4.22 and 4.18 upgrade guides

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25734 on 2026-08-27 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25734
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.18.x] CAMEL-24421: camel-spring-redis - apply a deserialization filter to the default JDK serializer

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25589 on 2026-08-24 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25589
GitHub pull request

[backport camel-4.22.x] CAMEL-24421: camel-spring-redis - apply a deserialization filter to the default JDK serializer

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25588 on 2026-08-24 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25588
GitHub pull request

CAMEL-24421: camel-spring-redis - apply a deserialization filter to the default JDK serializer

Fix merged in apache/camel PR #25587 on 2026-08-24 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/25587
Web page

[CAMEL-24421] camel-spring-redis: apply a configurable ObjectInputFilter to the default JDK serializer - ASF Jira

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-24421
Web page

Apache Camel Security Advisory - CVE-2026-78165 - Apache Camel

https://camel.apache.org/security/CVE-2026-78165.html

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-78165(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 10× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  2. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 54th percentile
  3. 2026-10-27 19:00 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-27 19:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  5. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  6. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  7. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 53rd percentile
  8. 2026-10-25 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  10. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  11. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  12. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 55th percentile
  13. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.8% · 54th percentile
  14. 2026-10-20 14:28 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-20 14:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  16. 2026-10-20 13:28 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-20 13:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  18. 2026-10-20 04:28 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-20 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  20. 2026-10-20 04:06 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-20 04:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  22. 2026-10-19 21:09 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-19 21:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
  24. 2026-10-19 17:20 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-19 17:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-8p5r-xpxr-x2x7 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 8.8
Show 3 more
  1. 2026-10-19 11:27 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-19 10:26 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.8 HIGH
  3. 2026-10-19 10:23 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-78165?
CVE-2026-78165 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 19, 2026. Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in Apache Camel Spring Redis component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 2.11.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. RedisConfiguration.getSerializer lazily built a bare JdkSerializationRedisSerializer whenever no serializer option was…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-78165 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-78165 was published on October 19, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 20, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-78165 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-78165 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (54th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-78165?
CVE-2026-78165 has a CVSS base score of 8.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-78165?
The CVE record's solution for CVE-2026-78165, written by its CNA Apache Software Foundation, names the fix: "Users on the 4.22.x releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1." The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-78165 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-78165

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-78165?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.