openssl_encrypt versions before 1.4.0 contain an insecure default configuration that trusts the entire RFC 1918 private address space in IntegrityProxyConfig trusted_proxies. Attackers on private networks can forge client certificate headers to bypass mTLS authentication when ProxyAuth validation is relaxed or modified.
CVE-2026-74882
Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-17. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 7.5
- EG Score
- 7.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 49(Track)EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity75% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability100% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 3%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 17, 2026
Last Modified
August 18, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026openssl_encrypt before 1.4.0 Insecure Default Configuration | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/openssl-encrypt-before-insecure-default-configurationIntegrity proxy trusts entire RFC 1918 private address space by default · Advisory · jahlives/openssl_encrypt · GitHub
https://github.com/jahlives/openssl_encrypt/security/advisories/GHSA-2592-7m3g-7fq6Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74882(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 19× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-20 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-20 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-20 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 00:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-19 13:07 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 02:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 15:18 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 15:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 14:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 14:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 22:33 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 22:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 11:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 11:13 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 11:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-74882?
When was CVE-2026-74882 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-74882 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74882?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74882?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74882
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74882?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.