CVE-2026-74751

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.49.4
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.4 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-27. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.4; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
9.4EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.4Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

riscv: lib: Fix ZBB strnlen reading past count boundary

The ZBB-optimized strnlen loop loads one word ahead before checking the aligned boundary:

REG_L t1, SZREG(t0) // load next word addi t0, t0, SZREG // advance orc.b t1, t1 bgeu t0, t4, 4f // boundary check AFTER load

where t4 = (s + count) & -SZREG. When s is aligned and count is a multiple of SZREG, t4 equals s + count and the loop loads a full word starting at exactly s + count. If s + count falls on a page boundary with the next page unmapped, this faults.

Fix by computing the aligned boundary from the last valid byte (s + count - 1) instead of s + count. This makes the loop stop at the word containing the last valid byte rather than potentially loading the word after it. The count == 0 case is already handled by the beqz early exit.

Also add a pre-loop guard (bgeu t0, t4) for the case where all valid bytes fit within the first word. With the adjusted boundary, t4 can equal t0, and entering the loop with stale register state from the first-word processing would produce incorrect results.

The final minu clamp ensures the result is still correct when the last loaded word extends past s + count - 1 within the same aligned word.

CVSS v3
9.4
EG Score
9.4(high)
EG Risk
47(Track)
EG Risk 47/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity94% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
26%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 26, 2026

Last Modified

August 27, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 27, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

riscv: lib: Fix ZBB strnlen reading past count boundary - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e697e30f3dd2da3a1df7dc0980546d5b53aea4b6
generic

riscv: lib: Fix ZBB strnlen reading past count boundary - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5d588c684833e678a0008eb69c33190f01a65f4b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74751(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 04:47 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-30 04:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-30 00:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-29 20:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-29 16:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-29 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-29 08:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-29 04:09 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-28 23:58 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-28 23:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-28 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-28 15:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-28 10:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-28 06:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-28 02:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-27 22:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-27 18:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-27 14:33 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-27 14:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-27 10:25 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-08-27 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-27 06:21 UTCEG score recompute 9.40
Show 4 more
  1. 2026-08-27 06:11 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.4 · severity → CRITICAL
  2. 2026-08-26 15:43 UTCNVD update
  3. 2026-08-26 14:43 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-26 14:41 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74751?
CVE-2026-74751 is a critical vulnerability published on August 26, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv: lib: Fix ZBB strnlen reading past count boundary The ZBB-optimized strnlen loop loads one word ahead before checking the aligned boundary: REG_L t1, SZREG(t0) // load next word addi t0, t0, SZREG // advance orc.b t1, t1 bgeu…
When was CVE-2026-74751 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74751 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 26, 2026, with the most recent update on August 27, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74751 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74751 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 73.7% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74751?
CVE-2026-74751 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.4 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74751?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74751, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74751

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74751?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.