CVE-2026-74674

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-22. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm: fix incorrect flush address in direct page table reclaim

When zap_pte_range reclaims a page table, it does:

pte_free_tlb(tlb, pmd_pgtable(pmdval), addr);

and this is unconditionally wrong: if this code executes, addr *always* points one past the end of the range covered by the table. The addr parameter is used to flush the TLB (really the paging-structure-cache) to drop references to the to-be-freed table, and any architecture that cares about the parameter will flush the wrong address. (But they'll still free the correct page).

I think it's worth contemplating why the kernel works at all.

If we hit the offending line of code, we will first clear the PMD entry (line 1954, zap_empty_pte_table), then we will issue pending flushes if force_flush is set (tlb_flush_mmu_tlbonly(tlb)), then we will skip the retry on line 1979 (phew!), and then we will do the offending pte_free_tlb call. *Or* we will clear the PMD entry immediately before pte_free_tlb (line 1983, zap_pte_table_if_empty).

If we have any pending flushes (i.e. we actually zapped any last-level entries) at the time we clear the PMD entry, then the flush really ought to flush all references to the table (Linus certainly seems to think it will on all architectures [0]).

The condition under which we have no accumulated flushes at the time of the clear is very complex (the whole zap_pte_range function has absurdly complex control flow). If we do hit the bad case, then we will end up clearing the PMD entry after the last time the range is flushed, and any CPU is free to cache a reference to the (empty) page table. If this happens due to an ordinary read or write, it would segfault, so it would be rare. But the cache could be speculatively filled as well. Then we'll flush the wrong address and then free and possibly reuse the table.

On x86, even flushing the wrong address works on non-KPTI Intel systems because INVLPG flushes *all* paging-structure-caches, not just the ones for the target address. But INVPCID does not, and flush_tlb_one_user will use INVPCID if it's available. And then we're toast. AMD systems are more susceptible: we set the EFER.TCE bit, which makes even INVLPG only flush the target address.

I think this might fix an issue in ripgrep reported here: https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep/issues/3494

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+55aFzBggoXtNXQeng5d_mRoDnaMBE5Y+URs+PHR67nUpMtaw@mail.gmail.com/T/#u

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 22, 2026

Last Modified

August 25, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

mm: fix incorrect flush address in direct page table reclaim - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/478a1c3abebfc717db0d1281a9cdd7befafee542
generic

mm: fix incorrect flush address in direct page table reclaim - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0b8ff21cbda8808c86b18f1b0ca2d0025af9a80a

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74674(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 28× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-30 01:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-29 23:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-29 11:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-29 00:49 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-29 00:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-28 21:42 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-28 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-28 01:29 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-28 01:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-27 14:25 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-27 14:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-27 03:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-26 16:13 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-26 16:13 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-26 14:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-26 04:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-25 17:34 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-25 17:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-25 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-25 06:29 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-25 06:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  23. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-25 05:55 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  25. 2026-08-24 14:18 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 3 more
  1. 2026-08-22 16:24 UTCNVD update
  2. 2026-08-22 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-22 15:35 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74674?
CVE-2026-74674 is a high vulnerability published on August 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm: fix incorrect flush address in direct page table reclaim When zappterange reclaims a page table, it does: ptefreetlb(tlb, pmd_pgtable(pmdval), addr); and this is unconditionally wrong: if this code executes, addr always points…
When was CVE-2026-74674 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74674 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 22, 2026, with the most recent update on August 25, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74674 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74674 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.9% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74674?
CVE-2026-74674 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74674?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74674, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74674

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74674?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.