CVE-2026-74632

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-22. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week

Also known asEUVD-2026-64569 (ENISA EUVD) · GHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc (GitHub Security Advisories)Source: ENISA EUVD

7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race

Patch series "mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race", v2.

There is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio implementation.

The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker (which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn with the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a racing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there.

This results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn being set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently is_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an ordinary THP folio.

This can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated incorrectly.

The solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and thus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very carefully.

The first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around huge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to load/store ordering in the fast path. It is placed first and kept as small as possible so that it can be backported on its own.

The second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent logic from the dynamically allocated one.

This patch (of 2):

If !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO, the huge_zero_folio is refcounted by huge_zero_refcount and returned by mm_get_huge_zero_folio().

When the caller is done with the huge zero page, its reference count is decremented. Only a shrinker can set the reference count to zero.

A race can unfortunately occur between a shrinker decrementing the reference count to zero and a concurrent page fault.

This is because shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() might, if very unlucky, be preempted between setting huge_zero_refcount to zero and writing an invalid value.

During this time get_huge_zero_folio() could write to huge_zero_pfn before shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() resumes.

In this event the huge zero folio will be persistently misidentified causing the THP code path to be entered inappropriately for the huge zero folio:

CPU 0 CPU 1 =======================================|================================= shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() | atomic_cmpxchg() sets refcount to 0 | xchg() sets huge_zero_folio to NULL | get_huge_zero_folio() | | atomic_inc_not_zero() -> zero preempted for a long time | Allocate new huge zero folio | | Write valid huge_zero_folio v | Write valid huge_zero_pfn Overwrite huge_zero_pfn with ~0UL <--- Invalid overwrite!

This results in is_huge_zero_pfn() and is_huge_zero_pmd() incorrectly returning false for a huge zero page which could result in issues like the huge zero folio being incorrectly split.

Note that the issue is with huge_zero_pfn not huge_zero_folio, as get_huge_zero_folio() uses cmpxchg() gated on huge_zero_folio being NULL with a retry loop and shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() uses xchg() to set huge_zero_folio.

Fix the issue by introducing a spinlock, huge_zero_lock, to prevent concurrent write of huge_zero_folio, huge_zero_pfn and huge_zero_refcount.

There needs to be significant care taken here to ensure correctness:

The fast path in get_huge_zero_folio() uses atomic_inc_not_zero(), which is outside of the critical section, and means huge zero allocation is gated on zero huge_zero_refcount.

The fast path doesn't use huge_zero_lock, so the critical section is irrelevant to it.

So invariants are required - huge_zero_refcount MUST:

* Only be set in the huge_zero_lock critical section to ensure serialisation of huge_zero_pfn, huge_zero_folio and ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.1% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-30). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 22, 2026

Last Modified

October 24, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 25, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/33192a26cddea7a7e4ca66e5c3eebd36fa8be2bb
Web page

mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ab7e4b407c7f58d1a003134eff3841f303d5ccc2
Web page

mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/105d04edbec83010df5728f74d17fd9c108e7553
Web page

mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6024f6d0d9b9ca5138bfc4ac6f6e4bdf616e42b3
Web page

mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f3a874a903053c53fb53ba287ea9eacda69c68e8
Web page

mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9332b080ad57650d1dc582e54517f9fc78ef89cc

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74632(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(1)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-tools-nvidia-tegra-rt-6.8 (6.8.0-1036.39) @ noble2026-10-31ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(4 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(2)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 6.1.99-1 (56 versions)
  • every version up to 6.1.187-1: fixed in 6.1.187-1
—
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.107-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.105-1: fixed in 6.12.105-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (167 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.9-1: fixed in 7.1.9-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(1)

Vendors that published advisories for this CVE beyond the curated set above. Broader coverage but minimal per-row detail — click through for the original advisory.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 91× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 264 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 164 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-31 10:25 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-31 10:25 UTCVendor advisory
  3. 2026-10-31 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-30 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  5. 2026-10-29 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  6. 2026-10-28 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  7. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  8. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-25 14:04 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  12. 2026-10-24 15:28 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-24 15:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-10-23 23:30 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-23 23:30 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-23 23:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  18. 2026-10-23 15:26 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-23 15:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  20. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  22. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  23. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  25. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-16 20:27 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-16 20:27 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-16 20:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  5. 2026-10-16 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-16 19:26 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-16 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  8. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  9. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  10. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  11. 2026-10-13 07:32 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-13 07:32 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-13 07:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  15. 2026-10-12 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  20. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  21. 2026-10-10 16:32 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-10 16:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  23. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  24. 2026-10-09 05:23 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-09 05:23 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-09 05:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  28. 2026-10-08 04:40 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-10-08 04:40 UTCVendor advisory
  30. 2026-10-08 04:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  31. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  32. 2026-10-07 01:13 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-07 01:13 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-07 01:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  35. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  36. 2026-10-06 13:53 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-06 13:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  38. 2026-10-06 03:00 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-10-06 03:00 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-10-06 03:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  41. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  42. 2026-10-05 13:50 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-10-05 13:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-10-05 02:31 UTCEG score recompute
  45. 2026-10-05 02:31 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-10-05 02:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  47. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  48. 2026-10-04 15:38 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-10-04 15:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  50. 2026-10-04 04:14 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-10-04 04:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  52. 2026-10-03 17:21 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-10-03 17:21 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-10-03 17:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  55. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  56. 2026-10-03 06:28 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-10-03 06:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  58. 2026-10-02 19:12 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-10-02 19:12 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-10-02 19:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  61. 2026-10-02 08:16 UTCVendor advisory
  62. 2026-10-02 08:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  63. 2026-10-01 21:23 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-10-01 21:23 UTCVendor advisory
  65. 2026-10-01 21:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  66. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  67. 2026-10-01 07:14 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-10-01 07:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  69. 2026-09-30 20:21 UTCEG score recompute
  70. 2026-09-30 20:21 UTCVendor advisory
  71. 2026-09-30 20:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  72. 2026-09-30 07:28 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-30 07:28 UTCVendor advisory
  74. 2026-09-30 07:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  75. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74632?
CVE-2026-74632 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 22, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/hugememory: fix hugezero_pfn race Patch series "mm/hugememory: fix hugezero_pfn race", v2. There is a subtle race in the reference-counted hugezerofolio implementation. The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74632 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74632 was published on August 22, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 24, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74632 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74632 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74632?
CVE-2026-74632 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74632?
A fix for CVE-2026-74632 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74632 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74632

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74632?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.