CVE-2026-74576

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.7%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type

Commit 280ea9c3154b ("mm/slab: avoid allocating slabobj_ext array from its own slab") avoided recursive allocation of obj_exts from kmalloc caches of the same size, by bumping the obj_exts array's allocation size whenever the array size equals the size of the object being allocated.

However, as reported by Danielle Costantino and Shakeel Butt, even slabs from kmalloc caches of different sizes can form a cycle by allocating obj_exts arrays from each other [1]:

What happened: a KMALLOC_NORMAL slab's obj_exts array (used by allocation profiling / memcg accounting) is itself kmalloc()'d from a KMALLOC_NORMAL cache, so the "slab holds another slab's obj_exts array" relation can form cycles. With sizeof(struct slabobj_ext) == 16 and the host's geometry:

  • kmalloc-512 has 64 objects/slab -> array is 64*16 == 1024 bytes,
served from kmalloc-1k;
  • kmalloc-1k has 32 objects/slab -> array is 32*16 == 512 bytes,
served from kmalloc-512.

A kmalloc-512 slab and a kmalloc-1k slab therefore hold each other's obj_exts array. Discarding one frees the other's array, which empties and discards that slab, which frees the first's array, and so on: __free_slab() -> free_slab_obj_exts() -> kfree() -> discard_slab() -> __free_slab() recurses along the cycle until the stack is exhausted.

With memory allocation profiling, this allows unbounded recursion in the free path and led to a stack overflow on a production host in the Meta fleet [1]:

BUG: TASK stack guard page was hit Oops: stack guard page RIP: 0010:kfree+0x8/0x5d0 Call Trace: __free_slab+0x66/0xc0 kfree+0x3f0/0x5d0 ... ( ~125x __free_slab <-> kfree ) ... do_syscall_64

It is proposed [1] to resolve this issue by always serving the obj_exts array allocation from kmalloc caches (or large kmalloc) of sizes larger than the object size. However, as pointed out by Vlastimil Babka [2], this can waste an excessive amount of memory as slabs from large kmalloc sizes (e.g. kmalloc-8k) generally need obj_exts arrays much smaller than the object size.

Therefore, rather than bumping the size, let us take a different approach; disallow formation of cycles between kmalloc types when allocating obj_exts arrays. Currently, all obj_exts arrays are served from normal kmalloc caches. Cycles cannot be created if obj_exts arrays of normal kmalloc caches are served from a special kmalloc type that can never have obj_exts arrays.

To achieve this, create a new kmalloc type called KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT. KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT caches are created with SLAB_NO_OBJ_EXT flag when either 1) memory allocation profiling is not permanently disabled, or 2) kmalloc types with a priority higher than KMALLOC_CGROUP are aliased with KMALLOC_NORMAL.

Sheaf bootstrapping for KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT caches now must be deferred because allocation of a barn can trigger obj_exts array allocation of normal kmalloc caches when the KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT cache for that size is not ready yet. For simplicity, perform bootstrapping of sheaves for all kmalloc caches later.

Introduce a new slab alloc flag, SLAB_ALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT, to prevent allocation of obj_exts arrays, and let kmalloc_slab() override the type to KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT when specified. Note that kmalloc_type() remains unchanged because kmalloc_flags() bypasses the kmalloc fastpath.

Do not pass SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE to kmalloc_flags() in alloc_slab_obj_exts() and instead use SLAB_ALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT only when the objects are allocated from normal kmalloc caches. While this prevents unbounded recursive allocation of obj_exts, it allows KMALLOC_NO_OBJ_EXT caches to have sheaves.

Since sheaf allocations specify SLAB_ALLOC_NO_RECURSE that prevents allocation of both sheaves and obj_exts arrays, the recursion depth is bounded.

obj_exts arrays for non- ---truncated---

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity75% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.5 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.7% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability100% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: yes (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.7%
EPSS %ILE
51st
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.5): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.5 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.5 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.7% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; 60 days if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable yes (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact partial (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ebefca49e4c69df24ba9307bfe0806230301d5c6
Web page

mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d9e6a7623938968e3752b67e37eaff097e559a54
Web page

mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/d01e88d421a6d07f35235600a43fbd0e551cf292
Web page

mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3e71bfbdd3fd81ee9fefd867fdb2be62bade4140

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74576(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux-6.126.12.100-1~deb12u1, 6.12.101-1~deb12u1
  • every version up to 6.12.107-1~deb12u1: fixed in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 6.12.96-1 (33 versions)
  • every version up to 6.12.105-1: fixed in 6.12.105-1
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (165 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.8-1: fixed in 7.1.8-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 12× in last 7d / 79× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 220 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 120 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 51st percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 20:28 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-16 20:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  7. 2026-10-16 19:27 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-16 19:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  9. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  10. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  11. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  12. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  13. 2026-10-13 07:34 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-13 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  15. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  16. 2026-10-12 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  21. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  22. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  23. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  24. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  25. 2026-10-06 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-06 21:57 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  2. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  3. 2026-10-06 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-06 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  5. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  6. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  8. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  9. 2026-10-04 21:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  10. 2026-10-04 07:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  11. 2026-10-03 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-03 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  13. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  14. 2026-10-03 03:38 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-03 03:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  16. 2026-10-02 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  17. 2026-10-02 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-02 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  19. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  20. 2026-10-01 08:42 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  21. 2026-09-30 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-09-30 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  23. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  24. 2026-09-28 23:35 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-09-28 23:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  26. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  27. 2026-09-28 10:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  28. 2026-09-27 22:31 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-27 22:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  30. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 50th percentile
  31. 2026-09-27 08:23 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-27 08:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  33. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  34. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  35. 2026-09-25 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-25 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  37. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.7% · 49th percentile
  38. 2026-09-24 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  39. 2026-09-23 23:31 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-09-23 23:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  41. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  42. 2026-09-23 11:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  43. 2026-09-22 23:47 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-09-22 23:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  45. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  46. 2026-09-22 11:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  47. 2026-09-22 00:04 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-22 00:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  49. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  50. 2026-09-21 12:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  51. 2026-09-21 00:28 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-21 00:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  53. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  54. 2026-09-20 12:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  55. 2026-09-20 00:13 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-20 00:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  57. 2026-09-19 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  58. 2026-09-19 00:38 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-19 00:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  60. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  61. 2026-09-18 12:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  62. 2026-09-18 01:02 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-18 01:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  64. 2026-09-17 13:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  65. 2026-09-17 00:51 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-17 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  67. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  68. 2026-09-16 13:04 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-16 13:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  70. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  71. 2026-09-16 01:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  72. 2026-09-15 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-15 13:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-cwq6-wj3w-xw2f · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.5
  74. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.4% · 31st percentile
  75. 2026-09-15 01:39 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74576?
CVE-2026-74576 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/slab: prevent unbounded recursion in free path with new kmalloc type Commit 280ea9c3154b ("mm/slab: avoid allocating slabobj_ext array from its own slab") avoided recursive allocation of obj_exts from kmalloc caches of the same…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74576 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74576 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74576 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74576 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.7% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (51st percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74576?
CVE-2026-74576 has a CVSS base score of 7.5 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74576?
A fix for CVE-2026-74576 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74576 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74576

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74576?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.