CVE-2026-74568

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.39.3
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration

Fix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and evicting that structure from the LPI xarray.

LPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI xarray (dist->lpi_xa). When the reference count of an LPI structure drops to zero, vgic_release_lpi_locked() removes the structure from the xarray and frees it under the xarray lock.

However, the release of an LPI can race with a concurrent LPI re-registration with the same INTID via vgic_add_lpi() on another CPU, since the reference count drop and the xarray eviction are not performed in a single atomic step. This can happen e.g. if the guest issues a DISCARD while the LPI is still referenced from a vCPU's active-pending list (ap_list), and the same INTID is re-mapped via MAPTI.

Particularly, vgic_release_lpi_locked() is called from two distinct paths: direct release via vgic_put_irq(), and deferred release via vgic_release_deleted_lpis(). During direct release, the issue can result in deleting a newly registered LPI from the xarray:

CPU0 (Releasing LPI) CPU1 (Adding new LPI) ==================== ===================== vgic_put_irq() __vgic_put_irq() refcount_dec_and_test() vgic_add_lpi() xa_lock_irqsave() old_irq = xa_load(.., intid) vgic_try_get_irq_ref(old_irq) == false new IRQ inserted --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..) xa_unlock_irqrestore() xa_lock_irqsave(); vgic_release_lpi_locked() __xa_erase(.., irq->intid) <-- BUG: new IRQ is erased kfree_rcu(old_irq)

During the deferred release path, the old IRQ can be leaked:

CPU0 (Releasing LPI) CPU1 (Adding new LPI) ==================== ===================== vgic_put_irq_norelease() __vgic_put_irq() refcount_dec_and_test() irq->pending_release = true vgic_add_lpi() xa_lock_irqsave() old_irq = xa_load(.., intid) vgic_try_get_irq_ref(oldirq) == false BUG: old IRQ overwritten --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..) xa_unlock_irqrestore()

vgic_release_deleted_lpis() xa_lock_irqsave() xa_for_each() { .. } <-- old IRQ with pending_release = true is gone, so it cannot be released

To fix the direct release path, move the reference count drop inside the xarray lock, making sure that vgic_add_lpi() never encounters the to-be-released LPI.

In the deferred release path, the refcount drop must happen under a raw spinlock, so the xarray lock cannot be grabbed, and the same solution does not work. Instead, update vgic_add_lpi(), so that if it evicts an LPI from the xarray, it takes on the responsibility of freeing it. Consequently, an LPI may now be freed concurrently after a deferred release drops the refcount, so accessing the pending_release field is no longer safe from use-after-free. Delete all uses of the flag, and update vgic_release_deleted_lpis() to identify orphaned LPIs purely based on their refcount.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3(high)
EG Risk
46(Track)
EG Risk 46/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity93% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d
generic

KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74568(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 42× in last 7d / 42× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-21 05:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-21 01:17 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-21 01:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-20 21:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-20 16:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-20 12:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-20 08:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-20 03:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-19 23:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-19 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-19 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-19 14:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-19 10:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-19 06:19 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-19 01:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-18 21:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-18 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-18 12:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-18 07:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-08-18 03:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-17 23:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-17 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-17 14:53 UTCEG score recompute
Show 17 more
  1. 2026-08-17 14:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-17 10:38 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-17 10:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-17 06:23 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-17 06:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCEG score recompute 9.30
  8. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.3 · severity → CRITICAL
  10. 2026-08-17 05:39 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-17 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-17 05:39 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  13. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-15 13:27 UTCNVD update
  16. 2026-08-15 12:38 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-15 12:37 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74568?
CVE-2026-74568 is a critical vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration Fix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and evicting that structure from the LPI xarray. LPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI…
When was CVE-2026-74568 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74568 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74568 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74568 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.6% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74568?
CVE-2026-74568 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.3 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74568?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74568, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74568

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74568?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.