CVE-2026-74568

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.39.3
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 9.3 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.3; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 3 sources updated this week
9.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 9.3Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration

Fix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and evicting that structure from the LPI xarray.

LPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI xarray (dist->lpi_xa). When the reference count of an LPI structure drops to zero, vgic_release_lpi_locked() removes the structure from the xarray and frees it under the xarray lock.

However, the release of an LPI can race with a concurrent LPI re-registration with the same INTID via vgic_add_lpi() on another CPU, since the reference count drop and the xarray eviction are not performed in a single atomic step. This can happen e.g. if the guest issues a DISCARD while the LPI is still referenced from a vCPU's active-pending list (ap_list), and the same INTID is re-mapped via MAPTI.

Particularly, vgic_release_lpi_locked() is called from two distinct paths: direct release via vgic_put_irq(), and deferred release via vgic_release_deleted_lpis(). During direct release, the issue can result in deleting a newly registered LPI from the xarray:

CPU0 (Releasing LPI) CPU1 (Adding new LPI) ==================== ===================== vgic_put_irq() __vgic_put_irq() refcount_dec_and_test() vgic_add_lpi() xa_lock_irqsave() old_irq = xa_load(.., intid) vgic_try_get_irq_ref(old_irq) == false new IRQ inserted --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..) xa_unlock_irqrestore() xa_lock_irqsave(); vgic_release_lpi_locked() __xa_erase(.., irq->intid) <-- BUG: new IRQ is erased kfree_rcu(old_irq)

During the deferred release path, the old IRQ can be leaked:

CPU0 (Releasing LPI) CPU1 (Adding new LPI) ==================== ===================== vgic_put_irq_norelease() __vgic_put_irq() refcount_dec_and_test() irq->pending_release = true vgic_add_lpi() xa_lock_irqsave() old_irq = xa_load(.., intid) vgic_try_get_irq_ref(oldirq) == false BUG: old IRQ overwritten --> __xa_store(.., intid, ..) xa_unlock_irqrestore()

vgic_release_deleted_lpis() xa_lock_irqsave() xa_for_each() { .. } <-- old IRQ with pending_release = true is gone, so it cannot be released

To fix the direct release path, move the reference count drop inside the xarray lock, making sure that vgic_add_lpi() never encounters the to-be-released LPI.

In the deferred release path, the refcount drop must happen under a raw spinlock, so the xarray lock cannot be grabbed, and the same solution does not work. Instead, update vgic_add_lpi(), so that if it evicts an LPI from the xarray, it takes on the responsibility of freeing it. Consequently, an LPI may now be freed concurrently after a deferred release drops the refcount, so accessing the pending_release field is no longer safe from use-after-free. Delete all uses of the flag, and update vgic_release_deleted_lpis() to identify orphaned LPIs purely based on their refcount.

CVSS v3
9.3
EG Score
9.3CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
42
EG Risk 42/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity93% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 9.3 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
7th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (9.3): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 9.3 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
9.3 CRITICALCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-18). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Oct 7, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbfe2b24a1ea9de35032dbdd100fdc700f5be92d
Web page

KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/292e80a159aa88635bf668a7212cfdf526b8bd52

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74568(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (165 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.8-1: fixed in 7.1.8-1
—

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 25× in last 7d / 129× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 377 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 277 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  2. 2026-10-19 14:14 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-19 14:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  4. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  5. 2026-10-18 16:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  6. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-17 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-17 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  9. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  10. 2026-10-16 20:26 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-16 20:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  12. 2026-10-16 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-16 19:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  14. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  15. 2026-10-16 11:11 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-16 11:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  17. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  18. 2026-10-15 11:29 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-15 11:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  20. 2026-10-15 10:28 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-15 10:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  22. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 7th percentile
  23. 2026-10-14 08:21 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-14 08:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  25. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-13 03:35 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-13 03:35 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  3. 2026-10-12 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  4. 2026-10-12 15:39 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-12 05:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  6. 2026-10-11 19:25 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  10. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  11. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  14. 2026-10-07 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  15. 2026-10-07 02:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  16. 2026-10-06 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  17. 2026-10-06 17:38 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-10-06 17:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  19. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 13:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  21. 2026-10-06 09:08 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-06 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  23. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  24. 2026-10-05 17:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  25. 2026-10-05 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  26. 2026-10-05 06:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  27. 2026-10-05 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-10-05 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  29. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  30. 2026-10-04 21:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  31. 2026-10-04 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  32. 2026-10-04 11:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  33. 2026-10-04 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  34. 2026-10-04 03:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  35. 2026-10-03 19:28 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-10-03 19:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  37. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  38. 2026-10-03 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  39. 2026-10-02 21:45 UTCEG score recompute
  40. 2026-10-02 21:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  41. 2026-10-02 15:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  42. 2026-10-02 07:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  43. 2026-10-02 01:58 UTCEG score recompute
  44. 2026-10-02 01:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  45. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  46. 2026-10-01 14:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  47. 2026-10-01 10:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  48. 2026-10-01 05:50 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  49. 2026-10-01 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  50. 2026-09-30 20:55 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-30 20:55 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  52. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  53. 2026-09-29 06:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  54. 2026-09-29 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  55. 2026-09-28 22:04 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-28 22:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  57. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  58. 2026-09-28 11:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  59. 2026-09-28 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  60. 2026-09-28 02:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  61. 2026-09-27 22:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  62. 2026-09-27 16:54 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-27 16:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  64. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  65. 2026-09-27 12:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  66. 2026-09-27 08:23 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-27 08:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  68. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  69. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  70. 2026-09-25 11:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  71. 2026-09-25 06:40 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  72. 2026-09-25 02:25 UTCEG score recompute
  73. 2026-09-25 02:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3
  74. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  75. 2026-09-24 13:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-gxv2-5vpw-rgjq · GitHub severity CRITICAL · GitHub CVSS 9.3

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74568?
CVE-2026-74568 is a critical-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: arm64: vgic: Fix race between LPI release and re-registration Fix a potential race between decrementing an LPI's reference count and evicting that structure from the LPI xarray. LPI structures are maintained in the VGIC LPI…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74568 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74568 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74568 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74568 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (7th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74568?
CVE-2026-74568 has a CVSS base score of 9.3 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74568?
A fix for CVE-2026-74568 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74568 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74568

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74568?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.