In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: openvswitch: fix potential UAF on meter attach failure
While attaching a newly created meter attach_meter() function makes
the new meter visible to other CPUs but can still fail afterwards.
On failure, it detaches the meter back and returns an error.
However, this is an unexpected behavior for the ovs_meter_cmd_set()
that uses a plain kfree(meter) on attach failure without waiting for
RCU readers to stop using it, assuming it was never visible.
This is never a problem for ovs-vswitchd as it always creates meters
before creating any flows that use them. But the UAF can be triggered
with a custom application using uAPI:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ovs_meter_execute (net/openvswitch/meter.c:653)
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810d152650 by task meter/2508
Call Trace:
ovs_meter_execute (net/openvswitch/meter.c:653)
do_execute_actions (net/openvswitch/actions.c:1407)
ovs_execute_actions (net/openvswitch/actions.c:1584)
ovs_packet_cmd_execute (net/openvswitch/datapath.c:703)
...
netlink_sendmsg (af_netlink.c:1900)
Allocated by task 2519:
__kasan_kmalloc (mm/kasan/common.c:398 mm/kasan/common.c:415)
ovs_meter_cmd_set (net/openvswitch/meter.c:422)
...
netlink_sendmsg (af_netlink.c:1900)
Freed by task 2519:
kfree (mm/slub.c:2705 mm/slub.c:6405 mm/slub.c:6720)
ovs_meter_cmd_set (net/openvswitch/meter.c:479)
...
netlink_sendmsg (af_netlink.c:1900)
Fix that by making sure attach_meter() doesn't make the meter visible
until all the checks are done and the function can't fail anymore.
This also makes sure the "hash" value is calculated after the potential
re-sizing of the table.
Reported by Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative as ZDI-CAN-31642.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it