CVE-2026-74434

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rxrpc: Don't move a peeked OOB message onto the pending queue

rxrpc_recvmsg_oob() takes a received oob message off recvmsg_oobq and, if a response is needed, moves it onto the pending_oobq tree. However, only the unlink from recvmsg_oobq is guarded by MSG_PEEK; the move onto pending_oobq always runs.

As a result, reading a challenge with MSG_PEEK leaves the skb on recvmsg_oobq while also adding it to pending_oobq. Since struct sk_buff's rbnode shares storage with its next and prev pointers, rb_insert_color() overwrites the list linkage, and the skb, which holds a single reference, becomes reachable from both queues at once.

When the socket is closed both queues are drained in turn. While draining recvmsg_oobq, __skb_unlink() follows the next and prev pointers that rbnode has overwritten and writes to a bad address. Also, as the skb holds a single reference but is freed from each queue, both the skb and the connection reference it holds are released twice. This leads to memory corruption and to a use-after-free caused by the connection refcount underflow.

MSG_PEEK does not consume the message from the queue, so only unlink it from recvmsg_oobq and then move it onto pending_oobq or free it when the message is actually consumed.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
48th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Oct 5, 2026
Patch available.
generic

rxrpc: Don't move a peeked OOB message onto the pending queue - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ada3931beb37068fcb725b34b0398457009f343
generic

rxrpc: Don't move a peeked OOB message onto the pending queue - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5f470cc883416fea6d3bce18ef96bf91dd49ffc3
generic

rxrpc: Don't move a peeked OOB message onto the pending queue - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5801cff7d5d7b4e9d877dfb627b23eb63167f02c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74434(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(4)

Vendor / EcosystemFix (by version range) / PatchReleasedSource
ubuntulinux-virtual-hwe-26.04-edge (7.0.0-34.34) @ resolute2026-10-05ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gcp-edge (7.0.0-1013.13~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-05ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-oracle-edge (7.0.0-1012.12~24.04.1) @ noble2026-10-05ubuntu
ubuntulinux-tools-gke-hwe-26.04 (7.0.0-1007.8) @ resolute2026-10-05ubuntu

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(4)

Every vendor that published an advisory referencing this CVE — pulled from our cve_vendor_advisories aggregation. Click any row for the vendor's original advisory page.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 57× in last 7d / 216× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 376 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 12:10 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-05 12:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-05 06:45 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-05 06:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-05 02:23 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-05 02:23 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-05 02:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  9. 2026-10-04 21:57 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-04 21:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-10-04 16:27 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-04 16:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-04 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-04 12:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-04 07:29 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-04 07:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-04 03:25 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-04 03:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-03 19:30 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-03 19:30 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-03 19:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-10-03 00:47 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-03 00:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-10-02 19:57 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-02 19:57 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-02 19:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-02 15:51 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-02 15:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-02 07:03 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-02 07:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-02 02:01 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-02 02:01 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-02 02:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-10-01 13:59 UTCVendor advisory
  12. 2026-10-01 13:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-10-01 09:55 UTCVendor advisory
  14. 2026-10-01 09:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-10-01 05:51 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-01 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-10-01 01:33 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-01 01:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-09-30 20:58 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-30 20:58 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-09-30 20:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-09-29 07:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-09-29 03:49 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-09-29 03:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  27. 2026-09-28 23:44 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-28 23:44 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-28 23:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-28 15:00 UTCEG score recompute
  31. 2026-09-28 15:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  33. 2026-09-28 10:53 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-28 10:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-28 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-28 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  37. 2026-09-28 02:45 UTCVendor advisory
  38. 2026-09-28 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  39. 2026-09-27 22:41 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-27 22:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-27 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-27 16:43 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-27 16:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  44. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  45. 2026-09-27 12:30 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-27 12:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-27 08:26 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-27 08:26 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-27 08:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  50. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  51. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  52. 2026-09-25 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-25 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  54. 2026-09-25 06:34 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-25 06:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  56. 2026-09-25 02:30 UTCVendor advisory
  57. 2026-09-25 02:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  58. 2026-09-24 17:02 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-24 17:02 UTCVendor advisory
  60. 2026-09-24 17:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  61. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  62. 2026-09-24 12:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  63. 2026-09-24 08:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  64. 2026-09-24 04:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-24 00:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
  66. 2026-09-23 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-23 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  68. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  69. 2026-09-23 13:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  70. 2026-09-23 08:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-09-23 04:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  72. 2026-09-23 00:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  73. 2026-09-22 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-22 20:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  75. 2026-09-22 16:01 UTCEPSS rescore

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74434?
CVE-2026-74434 is a critical vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Don't move a peeked OOB message onto the pending queue rxrpcrecvmsgoob() takes a received oob message off recvmsg_oobq and, if a response is needed, moves it onto the pending_oobq tree. However, only the unlink from…
When was CVE-2026-74434 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74434 was first published on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74434 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74434 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (48th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74434?
CVE-2026-74434 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74434?
A fix for CVE-2026-74434 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74434 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74434

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74434?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.