CVE-2026-74430

HIGHPre-NVD 7.57.5
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.5; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rxrpc: Fix ACKALL packet handling

rxrpc_input_ackall() accepts ACKALL packets without checking whether the call is in a state that can legitimately have outstanding transmit buffers. A forged ACKALL can therefore reach a new service call in RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_RECV_REQUEST before any reply packets have been queued.

In that state call->tx_top is zero and call->tx_queue is NULL, so rxrpc_rotate_tx_window() dereferences a NULL txqueue and triggers a null-pointer dereference.

Fix the handling of ACKALL packets by the following means:

(1) Add two new call states: RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_PRE_SEND which indicates that the client call is connected, but nothing has been transmitted as yet; and RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_ACK, which indicates that everything has been transmitted at least once, but we're now waiting for the stuff remaining in the Tx buffer to be ACK'd (retransmissions may still happen).

The RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_PRE_SEND state is set when the call is assigned a channel and transitions to RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_SEND_REQUEST when the first packet is transmitted.

RXRPC_CALL_CLIENT_AWAIT_REPLY is then narrowed in scope to indicate that all Tx packets have been ACK'd and we're now waiting for the reply to be received.

(2) As per Wyatt Feng's original patch[1], the ACKALL handler then checks that the call state is one in which there might be stuff in the Tx buffer to ACK, but now this includes AWAIT_ACK rather than AWAIT_REPLY. ACKALL packets are ignored if received in the wrong state.

Note that unlike Wyatt Feng's patch, it's no longer necessary to check to see if the Tx buffer exists as this the state set now covers this.

(3) Make the ACKALL handler use call->tx_transmitted rather than call->tx_top as the former is explicitly the highest packet seq number transmitted, whereas the latter has a looser definition.

Thanks to Jeffrey Altman for a description of the history of the ACKALL packet[1].

CVSS v3
7.5
EG Score
7.5(high)
EG Risk
38(Track)
EG Risk 38/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity75% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
27%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

rxrpc: Fix ACKALL packet handling - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9b6ce594808580b2a19e6e1aa459ef56c0153ac1
generic

rxrpc: Fix ACKALL packet handling - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8db6a2c95e36938076b37466ce36774526a5c8c3
generic

rxrpc: Fix ACKALL packet handling - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/523cb585672ae681b2d3b0d620aec5313774e2e2

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74430(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 30× in last 7d / 30× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 23:12 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-20 23:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  4. 2026-08-20 10:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-19 21:51 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-19 21:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-19 09:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-18 20:30 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-08-18 20:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  13. 2026-08-18 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-17 19:08 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-08-17 19:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-17 06:25 UTCEG score recompute
  18. 2026-08-17 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-17 05:55 UTCEG score recompute 7.50
  20. 2026-08-17 05:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.5 · severity → HIGH
  22. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  25. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 5 more
  1. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  3. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  4. 2026-08-15 06:13 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-15 06:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74430?
CVE-2026-74430 is a high vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix ACKALL packet handling rxrpcinputackall() accepts ACKALL packets without checking whether the call is in a state that can legitimately have outstanding transmit buffers. A forged ACKALL can therefore reach a new service…
When was CVE-2026-74430 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74430 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74430 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74430 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 73.0% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74430?
CVE-2026-74430 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.5 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74430?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74430, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74430

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74430?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.