In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: fix KASAN slab-out-of-bounds in amdgpu_coredump ring dump
The ring content dump in amdgpu_coredump() uses two separate loops over
adev->rings[]: the first counts rings with unsignalled fences to size
the allocation, and the second copies ring data into the allocated
buffers.
Both loops use the same condition to skip rings:
atomic_read(&ring->fence_drv.last_seq) == ring->fence_drv.sync_seq
Because last_seq is an atomic that is updated concurrently by the fence
signalling path, additional rings may appear unsignalled in the second
loop that were signalled during the first. When this happens, idx
exceeds the allocated ring_count and the store to coredump->rings[idx]
writes past the end of the kcalloc-ed buffer.
This was found during IGT stressful test amd_queue_reset which
triggers random GPU resets. The OVERSIZE subtest
(CMD_STREAM_EXEC_INVALID_PACKET_LENGTH_OVERSIZE on GFX ring) provokes
a ring timeout and subsequent coredump, which hits the race between
the counting and copying loops. The failure is non-deterministic and
depends on fence signalling timing during the reset.
KASAN log:
BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in amdgpu_coredump+0x1274/0x12f0 [amdgpu]
Write of size 4 at addr ffff888106154258 by task kworker/u128:5/23625
CPU: 16 UID: 0 PID: 23625 Comm: kworker/u128:5 Not tainted 6.19.0+ #35
Workqueue: amdgpu-reset-dev drm_sched_job_timedout [gpu_sched]
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0xa5/0x110
print_report+0xd1/0x660
kasan_report+0xf3/0x130
__asan_report_store4_noabort+0x17/0x30
amdgpu_coredump+0x1274/0x12f0 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_job_timedout+0xef0/0x16c0 [amdgpu]
drm_sched_job_timedout+0x194/0x5c0 [gpu_sched]
process_one_work+0x84b/0x1990
worker_thread+0x6b8/0x11b0
Allocated by task 23625:
kasan_save_stack+0x39/0x70
__kasan_kmalloc+0xc3/0xd0
__kmalloc_noprof+0x2ec/0x910
amdgpu_coredump+0x5c5/0x12f0 [amdgpu]
amdgpu_job_timedout+0xef0/0x16c0 [amdgpu]
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888106154200
which belongs to the cache kmalloc-rnd-09-96 of size 96
The buggy address is located 16 bytes to the right of
allocated 72-byte region [ffff888106154200, ffff888106154248)
72 bytes = 3 * sizeof(struct amdgpu_coredump_ring), so ring_count was 3
but idx reached 3+, writing ring_index (at struct offset 16) 16 bytes
past the allocation.
Fix by adding an idx < ring_count guard to the copy loop so it cannot
exceed the allocated count even when the fence state changes between
the two passes.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.
- EG Severity
- 7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-19). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it