CVE-2026-74347

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

netfilter: cttimeout: detach dataplane timeout policy and repurpose refcount

Add a refcount for struct nf_ct_timeout which is used by ct extension to set the custom ct timeout policy, this tells us that the ct timeout is being used by a conntrack entry. When the last conntrack entry drops the refcount on the ct timeout, the ct timeout is released.

Remove the refcount for control plane which controls if the ruleset refers to the timeout policy. After this update, it is possible to remove the ct timeout policy from nfnetlink_cttimeout immediately. This is for simplicity not to handle two refcounts on a single object.

Remove nf_queue_nf_hook_drop(): a packet sitting in nfqueue will just hold a reference to the nf_ct_timeout object until packet is reinjected, since this is part of the ct extension, this will be released by the time the conntrack is freed.

nf_ct_untimeout() is still called to clean up in a best effort basis: the ct timeout on existing entries gets removed when the ct timeout goes away, but as long as the iptables ruleset still refers to the ct timeout through a template, new conntracks may keep attaching it and extend its lifetime until the rule is removed.

nf_ct_untimeout() is not called anymore from module removal path, this is unlikely to find timeouts give module refcount is bumped, and the new refcount already tracks the ct timeout policy use so it is released when unused.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8(high)
EG Risk
40(Track)
EG Risk 40/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity78% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
0%
EPSS %ILE
2%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

netfilter: cttimeout: detach dataplane timeout policy and repurpose refcount - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9aeb0dcfeb460d33d61d434148b51103ab1d2013
generic

netfilter: cttimeout: detach dataplane timeout policy and repurpose refcount - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d6a9cdb8d3a51d9cfe546a09a518ab3d2671549

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74347(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 29× in last 7d / 29× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-20 17:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-20 05:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-19 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-08-19 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  7. 2026-08-19 05:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-18 18:03 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-18 18:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  11. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  12. 2026-08-18 06:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-17 18:57 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-17 18:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  16. 2026-08-17 06:26 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-08-17 06:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-17 05:56 UTCEG score recompute 7.80
  19. 2026-08-17 05:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 7.8 · severity → HIGH
  21. 2026-08-17 05:26 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-17 05:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  24. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
Show 4 more
  1. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  2. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  3. 2026-08-15 06:15 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-15 06:12 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74347?
CVE-2026-74347 is a high vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: cttimeout: detach dataplane timeout policy and repurpose refcount Add a refcount for struct nfcttimeout which is used by ct extension to set the custom ct timeout policy, this tells us that the ct timeout is being used…
When was CVE-2026-74347 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74347 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74347 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74347 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 97.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74347?
CVE-2026-74347 has a CVSS v3 base score of 7.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74347?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-74347, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-74347

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74347?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.