In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/irdma: Fix OOB read during CQ MR registration
Sashiko pointed out an unrelated bug during a previous patch:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260512183852.614045-1-jmoroni%40google.com
This change fixes the bug by eliminating the cqmr->split field which
was not being set properly and instead just checks the CQ resize
feature flag directly.
The cqmr->split field essentially tracks whether IRDMA_FEATURE_CQ_RESIZE
is set, but it was not being set until CQ creation time, which is _after_
CQ memory registration (the only other place where it is referenced).
As a result, it would always be false during MR registration and would
therefore cause irdma_handle_q_mem to populate cqmr->shadow even for GEN_2
HW and beyond:
cqmr->shadow = (dma_addr_t)arr[req->cq_pages];
The issue is that for GEN_2 and beyond, req->cq_pages may be exactly equal
to iwmr->page_cnt and therefore equal to the size of arr, which would cause
an OOB read by one.
What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)
- EG Severity
- Not assessed: no CVSS publishedA missing CVSS is not a severity of zero.
- EG Likelihood
- 0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
- Confirmed exploitation
- None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
- EG Priority
- No SSVC decision: EchelonGraph has not assessed this CVECISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the BOD 26-04 block below.
BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.
In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it