CVE-2026-74317

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.1%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ixgbe: do not configure xps for XDP queues

netif_set_xps_queue() should not be called for an XDP Tx queue, since such queues are not netdev-exposed. On systems with number of CPUs >=64, on E610 adapter, netdev is configured with maximum number queue pairs being 63 (due to MSI-X assignment), but configuring XDP results in 64 XDP queues.

So, during XDP program load, when netif_set_xps_queue() is called for the last XDP queue, we get a WARNING with a call trace and KASAN report afterwards (if enabled).

[ 2012.699800] WARNING: net/core/dev.c:2854 at __netif_set_xps_queue+0x116a/0x1e40, CPU#36: xdpsock/103668 [...] [ 2012.700029] RIP: 0010:__netif_set_xps_queue+0x116a/0x1e40 [ 2012.700035] Code: b6 34 06 48 89 f8 83 e0 07 83 c0 01 40 38 f0 7c 09 40 84 f6 0f 85 03 0a 00 00 0f b7 44 24 40 66 43 89 44 6a 18 e9 01 fb ff ff <0f> 0b e9 f2 ee ff ff 44 8b 44 24 44 45 85 c0 74 50 4d 85 e4 0f 84 [ 2012.700040] RSP: 0018:ffff8882369aeb28 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 2012.700046] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000000000000003f RCX: 0000000000000000 [ 2012.700050] RDX: 1ffff1111da3d891 RSI: ffff888120e34250 RDI: ffff8888ed1ec488 [ 2012.700054] RBP: ffff888913281560 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff8888ed1ec000 [ 2012.700058] R10: ffff8888a2e83180 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000007fa8 [ 2012.700061] R13: 000000000000003f R14: ffff888120e34854 R15: ffff8889132817c8 [ 2012.700065] FS: 00007fc8ea9ff740(0000) GS:ffff88884cefe000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 2012.700069] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 2012.700073] CR2: 00007f81c8000020 CR3: 00000002299f8006 CR4: 00000000007726f0 [ 2012.700077] PKRU: 55555554 [ 2012.700080] Call Trace: [ 2012.700084] [ 2012.700087] ? ktime_get+0x61/0x150 [ 2012.700097] ? usleep_range_state+0x133/0x1b0 [ 2012.700108] ? __pfx_usleep_range_state+0x10/0x10 [ 2012.700114] netif_set_xps_queue+0x31/0x50 [ 2012.700119] ixgbe_configure_tx_ring+0x472/0x920 [ixgbe] [...] [ 2012.700486] ixgbe_xdp+0x38f/0x750 [ixgbe]

[...]

[ 2012.701094] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in __netif_set_xps_queue+0x1ac5/0x1e40 [ 2012.701100] Write of size 4 at addr ffff88888d43cff8 by task xdpsock/103668

Skip XPS configuration for XDP Tx queues.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.1%
EPSS %ILE
2nd
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.1% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS. FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 16, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

ixgbe: do not configure xps for XDP queues - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a2a224f5e344ccb1ec3693a0735822db9214e2ca
Web page

ixgbe: do not configure xps for XDP queues - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7bd4355272de34c2e90e34b72c5613736d03c32b

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74317(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 19× in last 7d / 103× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 246 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 146 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 19:42 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-16 19:42 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-16 19:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  8. 2026-10-16 19:03 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-16 19:03 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-16 19:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  12. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  13. 2026-10-15 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-15 11:30 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  15. 2026-10-15 10:29 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-15 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  17. 2026-10-15 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  18. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  19. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  20. 2026-10-13 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-13 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-10-13 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  23. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  24. 2026-10-12 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
  25. 2026-10-11 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-10-06 22:28 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-10-06 22:28 UTCVendor advisory
  10. 2026-10-06 22:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  11. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  12. 2026-10-06 09:11 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-06 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-10-05 20:32 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-05 20:32 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-05 20:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  18. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  22. 2026-10-04 21:58 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-04 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-10-04 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-10-04 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  26. 2026-10-03 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-10-03 19:32 UTCVendor advisory
  28. 2026-10-03 19:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  29. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  30. 2026-10-02 17:54 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-10-02 17:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  32. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-10-02 07:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  35. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  36. 2026-10-01 07:49 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-10-01 07:49 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  38. 2026-09-30 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-30 21:00 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-30 21:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  41. 2026-09-29 00:02 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-29 00:02 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-29 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  45. 2026-09-28 06:21 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-28 06:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  47. 2026-09-27 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  48. 2026-09-27 19:32 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-27 19:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  50. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  51. 2026-09-27 08:28 UTCEG score recompute
  52. 2026-09-27 08:28 UTCVendor advisory
  53. 2026-09-27 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  54. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  55. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  56. 2026-09-25 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-25 02:34 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-25 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  59. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  60. 2026-09-24 07:24 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-24 07:24 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-09-23 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-23 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-23 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  66. 2026-09-23 08:04 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-23 08:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  68. 2026-09-22 21:15 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-22 21:15 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  70. 2026-09-22 10:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  71. 2026-09-21 23:37 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-21 23:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  73. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  74. 2026-09-21 12:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-22fj-hf7w-2cq4 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  75. 2026-09-21 01:57 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74317?
CVE-2026-74317 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ixgbe: do not configure xps for XDP queues netifsetxps_queue() should not be called for an XDP Tx queue, since such queues are not netdev-exposed. On systems with number of CPUs >=64, on E610 adapter, netdev is configured with…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74317 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74317 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 16, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74317 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74317 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (2nd percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74317?
CVE-2026-74317 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74317?
A fix for CVE-2026-74317 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74317 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74317

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74317?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.