CVE-2026-74311

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

virtio: rtc: tear down old virtqueues before restore

virtio_device_restore() resets the device and restores the negotiated features before calling ->restore(). viortc_freeze() intentionally leaves the existing virtqueues in place so the alarm queue can still wake the system, but viortc_restore() immediately calls viortc_init_vqs() without first deleting those old queues.

If virtqueue reinitialization fails on virtio-pci, the transport error path can run vp_del_vqs() against a newly allocated vp_dev->vqs array while vdev->vqs still contains the old virtqueues. vp_del_vqs() then looks up queue state through the new array and can dereference a NULL info pointer in vp_del_vq(), crashing the guest kernel during restore.

This can also happen during a non-faulty reinitialization, when one of the vp_find_vqs_msix() attempts is unsuccessful before a later attempt would succeed.

Delete the stale virtqueues before rebuilding them. If restore fails before virtio_device_ready(), reuse the remove path to stop the device. Once the device is ready, return errors directly instead of deleting the virtqueues again.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
6th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

virtio: rtc: tear down old virtqueues before restore - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aebebd1e9d70b650fc9e877082e0134edcf511da
Web page

virtio: rtc: tear down old virtqueues before restore - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/79366023aa891ca31376021a7bccff6384ca1ff1
Web page

virtio: rtc: tear down old virtqueues before restore - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/548d2208455f14e6121404c6e30e997bfe0cd264

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74311(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 8× in last 7d / 74× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 99 of 219 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. 1 repeat row among the latest 100 is merged into the row it repeats. The 120 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  7. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  9. 2026-10-13 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-13 07:38 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-13 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  12. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-12 15:40 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 19:26 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 16:41 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-11 14:00 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  19. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  20. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  21. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-10-06 22:29 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-06 22:29 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-06 22:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  25. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
Show 74 more
  1. 2026-10-06 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  2. 2026-10-05 20:41 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-05 20:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  4. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  5. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-05 09:41 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  8. 2026-10-04 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  9. 2026-10-04 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  10. 2026-10-03 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-10-03 19:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  12. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  13. 2026-10-02 18:22 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-02 18:22 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  15. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  18. 2026-10-01 08:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  19. 2026-09-30 21:00 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-09-30 21:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  22. 2026-09-29 00:02 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-29 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  25. 2026-09-28 06:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  26. 2026-09-27 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  27. 2026-09-27 19:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  28. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  29. 2026-09-27 08:28 UTCEG score recompute
  30. 2026-09-27 08:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  31. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 6th percentile
  32. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  33. 2026-09-25 02:34 UTCEG score recompute
  34. 2026-09-25 02:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  35. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  36. 2026-09-24 08:01 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  37. 2026-09-23 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-23 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  39. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-23 07:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  41. 2026-09-22 20:47 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-22 20:47 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  43. 2026-09-22 07:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-09-21 20:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  45. 2026-09-21 09:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  46. 2026-09-20 21:11 UTCEG score recompute
  47. 2026-09-20 21:11 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  48. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  49. 2026-09-20 10:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  50. 2026-09-19 23:00 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-19 23:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  52. 2026-09-19 11:04 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  53. 2026-09-18 21:58 UTCEG score recompute
  54. 2026-09-18 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  55. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  56. 2026-09-18 09:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  57. 2026-09-17 22:14 UTCEG score recompute
  58. 2026-09-17 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  59. 2026-09-17 11:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  60. 2026-09-16 23:32 UTCEG score recompute
  61. 2026-09-16 23:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  63. 2026-09-16 06:20 UTCEG score recompute
  64. 2026-09-16 06:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  66. 2026-09-15 19:20 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  67. 2026-09-15 07:10 UTCEG score recompute
  68. 2026-09-15 07:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  69. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  70. 2026-09-14 20:10 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  71. 2026-09-14 07:38 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-14 07:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  73. 2026-09-13 20:38 UTCEG score recompute
  74. 2026-09-13 20:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-4fvg-c4gx-gxg2 · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74311?
CVE-2026-74311 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: virtio: rtc: tear down old virtqueues before restore virtiodevicerestore() resets the device and restores the negotiated features before calling ->restore(). viortc_freeze() intentionally leaves the existing virtqueues in place so…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-74311 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-74311 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-74311 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74311 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (6th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74311?
CVE-2026-74311 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74311?
A fix for CVE-2026-74311 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74311 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74311

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74311?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.