CVE-2026-74269

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8—
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.6%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bnxt: fix head underflow on XDP head-grow

The xdp.py test test_xdp_native_adjst_head_grow_data crashes when run on a bnxt machine (and also crashes in NIPA).

It seems that the bug is an underflow in bnxt_rx_multi_page_skb, which builds the skb head:

napi_build_skb(data_ptr - bp->rx_offset, rxr->rx_page_size);

The problem with this expression is that in page mode, rx_offset is:

bp->rx_offset = NET_IP_ALIGN + XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM;

Which evaluates (at least on x86_64) to 258.

The test test_xdp_native_adjst_head_grow_data tests a case where the head is adjusted by -256.

When this test runs, data_ptr is shifted to frag_start + 2 (where frag_start = page_address(page) + offset).

Then, bnxt_rx_multi_page_skb is invoked and the napi_build_skb expression subtracts 258, landing at an address before frag_start. This could be either the previous fragment or the previous physical page when the offset is < 256 (e.g. if the fragment started at offset 0).

When the skb is freed, the page pool fragment reference is dropped on either the wrong page or the wrong frag of the right page. In either case, the corrupted reference count can lead to the page being prematurely recycled while still in use. Once (incorrectly) recycled, it can be handed out again and on driver teardown this would result in a double free.

The commit under fixes updated this code to handle the case where the native page size is >= 64k, but it unintentionally broke the head grow case.

To fix this, add an offset field to struct bnxt_sw_rx_bd, mirroring the existing offset field in struct bnxt_sw_rx_agg_bd. Populate it on allocation and preserve it on reuse.

In bnxt_rx_multi_page_skb, use the newly added offset field to compute the fragment start and pass that to napi_build_skb. Adjust the layout with skb_reserve.

There are two cases, the non-adjustment case and the adjustment case.

In both cases, the skb is built at page_address(page) + offset to account for the case where the native page size >= 64K and skb_reserve is called with data_ptr - (page_address(page) + offset). That difference equals bp->rx_offset when data_ptr was not moved, or bp->rx_offset + xdp_adjust when XDP adjusted the head.

Re-running the failing test with this commit applied causes the test to run successfully to completion.

The other rx_skb_func implementations don't have this issue.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8CRITICALmedium confidence
EG Risk
49
EG Risk 49/100CISA SSVC

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
CISA SSVC: Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.
EPSS PROB
0.6%
EPSS %ILE
49th
KEV
Not listed

CISA SSVCTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* or Attend at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines at low or medium mission impact and sooner than that at high.

Exploitation none (no KEV listing, exploit record or EPSS ≥ 50%) · Automatable unknown (not published for this CVE) · Technical impact total (CVSS ≥ 9.0). Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it: high means the affected system is essential to your organisation's mission, or its compromise could cause irreversible harm to people. CISA's decision table

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

September 21, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Sep 28, 2026
Patch available.
generic

bnxt: fix head underflow on XDP head-grow - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e26657fe3b85c068b01f42bb0c602f242d643ba9
generic

bnxt: fix head underflow on XDP head-grow - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bb72b1c6755631c74b7e0878ee55bb81c06776c0
generic

bnxt: fix head underflow on XDP head-grow - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4c03275bc4435cc8e25f7f3f08aff58c0e783d8d

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-74269(2)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(5)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

Additional Vendor Advisories

(5)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 48× in last 7d / 235× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 386 total refreshes for this CVE.

  1. 2026-10-05 06:49 UTCVendor advisory
  2. 2026-10-05 06:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-10-05 06:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-10-05 02:24 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-05 02:24 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-05 02:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-10-04 21:58 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-04 21:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-04 12:32 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-04 12:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-04 08:08 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-04 08:08 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-10-04 03:31 UTCVendor advisory
  15. 2026-10-04 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-10-03 19:32 UTCEG score recompute
  17. 2026-10-03 19:32 UTCVendor advisory
  18. 2026-10-03 19:32 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-10-03 02:10 UTCVendor advisory
  21. 2026-10-03 02:10 UTCGHSA enrichment
  22. 2026-10-02 21:46 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-10-02 21:46 UTCVendor advisory
  24. 2026-10-02 21:46 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-10-02 15:52 UTCVendor advisory
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-02 15:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCVendor advisory
  4. 2026-10-02 07:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-10-01 14:44 UTCVendor advisory
  7. 2026-10-01 14:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-10-01 10:20 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-01 10:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-10-01 05:57 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-01 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-10-01 01:34 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-01 01:34 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-09-30 21:01 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-09-30 21:01 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-09-30 21:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-09-29 15:24 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-09-29 04:27 UTCVendor advisory
  19. 2026-09-29 04:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-09-29 00:03 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-09-29 00:03 UTCVendor advisory
  22. 2026-09-29 00:02 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-09-28 11:59 UTCVendor advisory
  25. 2026-09-28 11:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  26. 2026-09-28 07:35 UTCVendor advisory
  27. 2026-09-28 07:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  28. 2026-09-28 03:12 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-28 03:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  30. 2026-09-27 22:48 UTCVendor advisory
  31. 2026-09-27 22:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  32. 2026-09-27 17:25 UTCEG score recompute
  33. 2026-09-27 17:25 UTCVendor advisory
  34. 2026-09-27 17:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  35. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescore
  36. 2026-09-27 12:57 UTCVendor advisory
  37. 2026-09-27 12:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  38. 2026-09-27 08:29 UTCEG score recompute
  39. 2026-09-27 08:29 UTCVendor advisory
  40. 2026-09-27 08:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
  41. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescore
  42. 2026-09-26 00:28 UTCEPSS rescore
  43. 2026-09-25 11:53 UTCVendor advisory
  44. 2026-09-25 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  45. 2026-09-25 06:59 UTCVendor advisory
  46. 2026-09-25 06:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  47. 2026-09-25 02:35 UTCVendor advisory
  48. 2026-09-25 02:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  49. 2026-09-24 17:04 UTCEG score recompute
  50. 2026-09-24 17:04 UTCVendor advisory
  51. 2026-09-24 17:04 UTCGHSA enrichment
  52. 2026-09-24 14:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  53. 2026-09-24 09:44 UTCVendor advisory
  54. 2026-09-24 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  55. 2026-09-24 05:20 UTCVendor advisory
  56. 2026-09-24 05:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  57. 2026-09-24 00:56 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-24 00:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  59. 2026-09-23 20:33 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-23 20:33 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-23 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichment
  62. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescore
  63. 2026-09-23 14:24 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-23 14:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  65. 2026-09-23 09:59 UTCVendor advisory
  66. 2026-09-23 09:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
  67. 2026-09-23 05:35 UTCVendor advisory
  68. 2026-09-23 05:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  69. 2026-09-23 01:12 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-23 01:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
  71. 2026-09-22 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-22 20:48 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-22 20:48 UTCGHSA enrichment
  74. 2026-09-22 12:55 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-22 12:55 UTCGHSA enrichment

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-74269?
CVE-2026-74269 is a critical vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bnxt: fix head underflow on XDP head-grow The xdp.py test testxdpnativeadjstheadgrowdata crashes when run on a bnxt machine (and also crashes in NIPA). It seems that the bug is an underflow in bnxtrxmultipageskb, which builds the…
When was CVE-2026-74269 disclosed?
CVE-2026-74269 was first published on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on September 21, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-74269 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-74269 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.6% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (49th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-74269?
CVE-2026-74269 has a CVSS base score of 9.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-74269?
A fix for CVE-2026-74269 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-74269 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-74269

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-74269?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.