CVE-2026-73800

HIGHPre-NVD 8.88.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

This high-severity CVE scores 8.8 under CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit probability: 0.5% (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs). No GitHub Security Advisory CVSS is on record for this CVE.

Triggered by: Headline CVSS from CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1
Sources: CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1, EPSS

Also known asEUVD-2026-101106 (ENISA EUVD)Source: ENISA EUVD

8.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan mitigationRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.5%CVSS: 8.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but no release containing it is confirmed — find the release that contains it; until it is applied, mitigate (WAF / firewall / segmentation).

Gitea resolves local reusable workflow files from a fork's head commit when a trusted base-branch workflow runs for a pull_request_target event. A fork author can modify a referenced reusable workflow so attacker-controlled code executes with the repository and organization secrets available to that event. Exploitation requires a base workflow that calls a local reusable workflow, and bypasses the intended separation between trusted base code and untrusted fork code.

CVSS v3
8.8
EG Score
8.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
40
EG Risk 40/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity88% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 8.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.5% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's SSVC Automatable value: no (Vulnrichment).
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.
EPSS PROB
0.5%
EPSS %ILE
44th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (8.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 8.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
8.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.CISA-ADP (Vulnrichment) CVSS v3.1 · CVSS v3.1
EG Likelihood
0.5% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-26). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is referenced, but no release containing it is confirmed. Check the referenced fix and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains it and apply that within your standard update timelines; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Exploitation none (CISA Vulnrichment) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). All three are CISA's SSVC values (Vulnrichment). EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA Vulnrichment) · Technical impact total (CISA Vulnrichment). Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

October 14, 2026

Last Modified

October 18, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Oct 18, 2026
Fix referenced — no release confirmed yet. Sources: github, github_pr.
GitHub pull request

fix(actions): resolve pull_request_target reusable workflows at the base commit (#38886)

Fix merged in go-gitea/gitea PR #38897 on 2026-08-12 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38897
GitHub pull request

fix(actions): resolve pull_request_target reusable workflows at the base commit

Fix merged in go-gitea/gitea PR #38886 on 2026-08-12 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38886
Web page

Gitea 1.27.2 is released | Gitea Blog

https://blog.gitea.com/release-of-1.27.2/
GitHub advisoryMentions a patch (unverified)

Secret Exfiltration via Reusable Workflow Resolution in pull_request_target Events · Advisory · go-gitea/gitea · GitHub

https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-r9ch-mqjm-g67v

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 9× in last 7d / 21× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

  1. 2026-10-27 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  2. 2026-10-27 11:03 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-10-26 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  4. 2026-10-25 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  5. 2026-10-25 14:05 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-10-24 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  7. 2026-10-23 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  8. 2026-10-22 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  9. 2026-10-21 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  10. 2026-10-20 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  11. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.5% · 44th percentile
  12. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  13. 2026-10-18 13:39 UTCEG score recomputeFirst assessed: 8.8 HIGH
  14. 2026-10-18 13:38 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 8.8 · severity → HIGH
  15. 2026-10-18 03:14 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  17. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 12th percentile
  18. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 11th percentile
  19. 2026-10-14 15:25 UTCNVD update
  20. 2026-10-14 14:52 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-14 14:49 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-73800?
CVE-2026-73800 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on October 14, 2026. Gitea resolves local reusable workflow files from a fork's head commit when a trusted base-branch workflow runs for a pullrequesttarget event. A fork author can modify a referenced reusable workflow so attacker-controlled code executes with the repository and organization secrets available to that…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-73800 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-73800 was published on October 14, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 18, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-73800 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-73800 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (44th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73800?
CVE-2026-73800 has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (CISA-ADP / Vulnrichment enrichment; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73800?
A fix for CVE-2026-73800 is referenced (a reference tagged "Patch", often a source commit), but EchelonGraph has no release containing it on record. Check that reference and the vendor's advisory for a release that contains the fix and update to it; until then, restrict network exposure of the affected system or apply the vendor's mitigation.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-73800

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73800?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.