On affected platforms running Arista EOS with both 802.1X port authentication and the RADIUS proxy feature configured with dynamic authorization, a low-privileged attacker on an adjacent network segment who induces a RADIUS packet through a configured RADIUS proxy client can prevent RADIUS dynamic authorization messages, including Change-of-Authorization (CoA) and Disconnect-Requests as defined in RFC 5176, from being applied to locally authenticated 802.1X sessions. This allows an endpoint session that a RADIUS server or network access control system has ordered disconnected to remain authorized on the network. Both 802.1X port authentication with dynamic authorization and RADIUS proxy with dynamic authorization must be explicitly configured for a deployment to be exposed to this issue. This issue was discovered internally by Arista, and the company is not aware of any malicious exploitation of this vulnerability in customer networks.
CVE-2026-73449
Score 5.9 from GitHub Security Advisory published 2026-09-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 5.9; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 5.9
- EG Score
- 5.9(high)
- EG Risk
- 27(Track)EG Risk 27/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity59% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability0% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 4%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
September 14, 2026
Last Modified
September 16, 2026
Advisory Details (1)
Auto-updated Sep 14, 2026Security Advisory 0149 - Arista
https://www.arista.com/en/support/advisories-notices/security-advisory/24705-security-advisory-0149Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-73449(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 18× in last 7d / 18× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-09-19 17:51 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-19 17:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-18 18:37 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-18 18:37 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-17 19:23 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 19:12 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 18:54 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-16 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-09-15 19:38 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 19:38 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-15 19:14 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-15 19:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-09-14 22:19 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 22:06 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-09-14 22:04 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-73449?
When was CVE-2026-73449 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-73449 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73449?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73449?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-73449
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73449?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.