stoatchat before 0.15.0 contains a permission bypass vulnerability in the message_fetch route that checks only ViewChannel permission instead of requiring ReadMessageHistory. Attackers with ViewChannel access but ReadMessageHistory denied can retrieve individual message content by ID, bypassing the intended history restriction enforced by bulk read routes.
CVE-2026-73059
Score 6.5 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-16. a secondary CVSS source baseline 6.5; sources differ by 0.0.
- Lower severity and no public exploit yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 6.5
- EG Score
- 6.5(high)
- EG Risk
- 34(Track)EG Risk 34/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity65% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- 0%
- EPSS %ILE
- 13%
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 16, 2026
Last Modified
August 17, 2026
Advisory Details (2)
Auto-updated Aug 16, 2026stoatchat before 0.15.0 Permission Bypass via message_fetch | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/stoatchat-before-permission-bypass-via-message-fetchfetching a single message checks only ViewChannel, not ReadMessageHistory (bypasses a view-without-history channel restriction) · Advisory · stoatchat/stoatchat · GitHub
Affected: 0.8.2). That fix is actually why message_query and message_search now carry the R
https://github.com/stoatchat/stoatchat/security/advisories/GHSA-8qp4-h9xf-2vqrVendor Advisories for CVE-2026-73059(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(1)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 16× in last 7d / 16× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-20 18:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 18:21 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-19 18:21 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 16:59 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-18 16:59 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-17 16:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 14:39 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-17 14:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
- 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
- 2026-08-16 14:36 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 13:27 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-16 13:26 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Related CVEs(same CWE)
Same CWE
10 shownCWE-863
Frequently asked(5)
What is CVE-2026-73059?
When was CVE-2026-73059 disclosed?
Is CVE-2026-73059 actively exploited?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-73059?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-73059?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-73059
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-73059?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.