CVE-2026-72860

HIGHPre-NVD 8.58.5
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This high-severity CVE scores 8.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: secondary
8.5EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 8.5Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The POST /api/provider-nodes/validate route in 9router takes a caller-supplied baseUrl and issues server-side HTTP requests to it, guarding the destination with assertPublicUrl from src/shared/utils/ssrfGuard.js. That guard compares hostname strings only: it resolves no DNS, does not revalidate after a redirect, and its IPv4-mapped IPv6 branch is unreachable. The branch matches ^::ffff:(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+)$, but the WHATWG URL parser canonicalizes such literals to hextets before the guard runs, so new URL("http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]/").hostname yields [::ffff:7f00:1] and the pattern is tested against a string it is never handed. Every IPv4-mapped address therefore passes, and http://[::ffff:7f00:1] and http://[::ffff:a9fe:a9fe] reach loopback and link-local metadata addresses; a hostname whose A record points at an internal address passes as well because no resolution occurs. In the custom-embedding branch the upstream response body is truncated to 200 bytes and returned to the caller whenever the upstream status is neither 2xx nor 401 nor 403, which discloses the beginning of internal responses, and the other validation types remain usable for blind internal port scanning through status and timing differences. The caller-supplied apiKey is forwarded to the internal destination as an Authorization Bearer header. A dashboard session is required by default, and none is required when requireLogin is disabled.

CVSS v3
8.5
EG Score
8.5(low)
EG Risk
43(Track)
EG Risk 43/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity85% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 20, 2026

Last Modified

August 20, 2026

Advisory Details (6)

Auto-updated Aug 20, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. No patch confirmed yet. Sources: github_pr.
generic

9router Server-Side Request Forgery via /api/provider-nodes/validate Because the IPv4-Mapped IPv6 Denylist Check Is Unreachable | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/9router-server-side-request-forgery-via-api-provider-nodes-validate-because-the-ipv4-mapped-ipv6-denylist-check-is-unreachable
generic

GitHub - decolua/9router: Unlimited FREE AI coding. Connect Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Cline, Copilot, Antigravity to FREE Claude/GPT/Gemini via 40+ providers. Auto-fallback, RTK -40% tokens, never hit limits. · GitHub

https://github.com/decolua/9router
github_pr

fix(ssrf): judge IPv4-mapped IPv6 by address, not by spelling

Upstream fix in progress (PR #3370 · decolua/9router, state=closed)

https://github.com/decolua/9router/pull/3370
generic

9router/src/app/api/provider-nodes/validate/route.js at master · decolua/9router · GitHub

https://github.com/decolua/9router/blob/master/src/app/api/provider-nodes/validate/route.js
generic

9router/src/shared/utils/ssrfGuard.js at master · decolua/9router · GitHub

https://github.com/decolua/9router/blob/master/src/shared/utils/ssrfGuard.js
generic🟡 PoC Available

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in /api/provider-nodes/validate via bypassable URL guard · Issue #3293 · decolua/9router · GitHub

https://github.com/decolua/9router/issues/3293

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72860(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(2)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-20 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-20 21:41 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-72860?
CVE-2026-72860 is a high vulnerability published on August 20, 2026. The POST /api/provider-nodes/validate route in 9router takes a caller-supplied baseUrl and issues server-side HTTP requests to it, guarding the destination with assertPublicUrl from src/shared/utils/ssrfGuard.js. That guard compares hostname strings only: it resolves no DNS, does not revalidate…
When was CVE-2026-72860 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72860 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 20, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72860?
CVE-2026-72860 has a CVSS v3 base score of 8.5 (NVD). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72860?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72860, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72860

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72860?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.