The POST /api/provider-nodes/validate route in 9router takes a caller-supplied baseUrl and issues server-side HTTP requests to it, guarding the destination with assertPublicUrl from src/shared/utils/ssrfGuard.js. That guard compares hostname strings only: it resolves no DNS, does not revalidate after a redirect, and its IPv4-mapped IPv6 branch is unreachable. The branch matches ^::ffff:(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+)$, but the WHATWG URL parser canonicalizes such literals to hextets before the guard runs, so new URL("http://[::ffff:127.0.0.1]/").hostname yields [::ffff:7f00:1] and the pattern is tested against a string it is never handed. Every IPv4-mapped address therefore passes, and http://[::ffff:7f00:1] and http://[::ffff:a9fe:a9fe] reach loopback and link-local metadata addresses; a hostname whose A record points at an internal address passes as well because no resolution occurs. In the custom-embedding branch the upstream response body is truncated to 200 bytes and returned to the caller whenever the upstream status is neither 2xx nor 401 nor 403, which discloses the beginning of internal responses, and the other validation types remain usable for blind internal port scanning through status and timing differences. The caller-supplied apiKey is forwarded to the internal destination as an Authorization Bearer header. A dashboard session is required by default, and none is required when requireLogin is disabled.
CVE-2026-72860
This high-severity CVE scores 8.5 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).
- High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.
- CVSS v3
- 8.5
- EG Score
- 8.5(low)
- EG Risk
- 43(Track)EG Risk 43/100SSVC: Track
EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).
How it’s computedSeverity85% × 45%Exploitation0% × 40%Automatability30% × 15%Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence. - EPSS PROB
- —
- EPSS %ILE
- —
- KEV
- Not listed
Published
August 20, 2026
Last Modified
August 20, 2026
Advisory Details (6)
Auto-updated Aug 20, 20269router Server-Side Request Forgery via /api/provider-nodes/validate Because the IPv4-Mapped IPv6 Denylist Check Is Unreachable | Advisories | VulnCheck
https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/9router-server-side-request-forgery-via-api-provider-nodes-validate-because-the-ipv4-mapped-ipv6-denylist-check-is-unreachableGitHub - decolua/9router: Unlimited FREE AI coding. Connect Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Cline, Copilot, Antigravity to FREE Claude/GPT/Gemini via 40+ providers. Auto-fallback, RTK -40% tokens, never hit limits. · GitHub
https://github.com/decolua/9routerfix(ssrf): judge IPv4-mapped IPv6 by address, not by spelling
Upstream fix in progress (PR #3370 · decolua/9router, state=closed)
https://github.com/decolua/9router/pull/33709router/src/app/api/provider-nodes/validate/route.js at master · decolua/9router · GitHub
https://github.com/decolua/9router/blob/master/src/app/api/provider-nodes/validate/route.js9router/src/shared/utils/ssrfGuard.js at master · decolua/9router · GitHub
https://github.com/decolua/9router/blob/master/src/shared/utils/ssrfGuard.jsServer-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in /api/provider-nodes/validate via bypassable URL guard · Issue #3293 · decolua/9router · GitHub
https://github.com/decolua/9router/issues/3293Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72860(1)
These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.
Weakness Classification(2)
MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.
Data Freshness Timeline
(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)
Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.
- 2026-08-20 22:24 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 21:42 UTCEG score recompute
- 2026-08-20 21:41 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked
Frequently asked(4)
What is CVE-2026-72860?
When was CVE-2026-72860 disclosed?
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72860?
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72860?
Dependency Blast Radius
Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72860
Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72860?
EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.