CVE-2026-72844

MEDIUMPre-NVD 6.36.3
EchelonGraph scoreLOW confidence

This medium-severity CVE scores 6.3 under a secondary CVSS source (NVD's own analysis pending). EPSS exploit-prediction score not yet available (the EPSS model rescores nightly; freshly-published CVEs typically appear within 48 hours). GitHub Security Advisory data not yet ingested — confidence will rise once GHSA publishes (typical lag: hours to days for open-source ecosystem CVEs; never for infrastructure-only CVEs).

Triggered by: NVD CVSS baseline
Sources: secondary
6.3EG
EchelonGraph verdictMonitorLow exploitation likelihood right now — keep watching.
  • Lower severity and no public exploit yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: CVSS: 6.3Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

The Lean 4 kernel does not verify that the structure named in a projection expression matches the type of the value being projected, and environment::add_inductive in src/kernel/inductive.cpp did not type check the nested inductive applications that are replaced by auxiliary types, so their parametric arguments escaped checking. A metaprogram running in the Lean process can register an ill-typed nested inductive whose constructor applies a .proj C 0 projection to a value of the unrelated type W, and the kernel admits the declaration through the ordinary checked addDecl path at maximum kernel checking, without sorry, unsafeCast, debug.skipKernelTC, addDeclWithoutChecking, FFI, or a modified .olean file. The result is a type confusion yielding a proof of False that carries no axioms, from which any proposition can be derived. The published proof of concept additionally pads two expressions until their hashes and approximate depths collide, which defeats kernel caching; that is the technique used to reach the flaw, not its cause. Exploitation requires running a metaprogram in-process, for example by building a project or importing a malicious Lake dependency.

CVSS v3
6.3
EG Score
6.3(low)
EG Risk
33(Track)
EG Risk 33/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity63% × 45%
Exploitation0% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
EPSS %ILE
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 20, 2026

Last Modified

August 20, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 20, 2026
🔬 Proof of concept available. Upstream fix merged — awaiting tagged release. Sources: github_commit, github_pr.
generic🟡 PoC Available

Lean 4 Kernel Type Checking Bypass via Mismatched Structure Projections | Advisories | VulnCheck

https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/lean-4-kernel-type-checking-bypass-via-mismatched-structure-projections
generic

GitHub - leanprover/lean4: Lean 4 programming language and theorem prover · GitHub

https://github.com/leanprover/lean4
generic🟡 PoC Available

oss-security - Lean 4 kernel soundness bug: forging proofs via nested inductive projections (0 = 1 demonstrated)

https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/02/1
generic

GitHub - xrchz/CollatzLean: Collatz conjecture in Lean · GitHub

https://github.com/xrchz/CollatzLean
generic

GitHub - endrazine/lean-cve-poc: Example of proving "0 = 1" using a vulnerability in the Lean 4 kernel. · GitHub

https://github.com/endrazine/lean-cve-poc
github_pr

fix: missing check at kernel inductive declaration

Fix merged in leanprover/lean4 PR #14577 on 2026-07-28 — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/14577
github_commit

commit a39eab69e1ee (leanprover/lean4)

Fix landed in leanprover/lean4 commit a39eab69e1ee — awaiting tagged release

https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/commit/a39eab69e1eee9ad38f4efe507907b1026a77808
generic

Kernel accepts wrong-structure projections, allowing an axiom-free proof of False · Issue #14576 · leanprover/lean4 · GitHub

https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/14576

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72844(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Weakness Classification(1)

MITRE Common Weakness Enumeration — the root-cause categories this CVE belongs to.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 3× in last 7d / 3× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-20 18:17 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-08-20 17:32 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-20 17:31 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(4)

What is CVE-2026-72844?
CVE-2026-72844 is a medium vulnerability published on August 20, 2026. The Lean 4 kernel does not verify that the structure named in a projection expression matches the type of the value being projected, and environment::add_inductive in src/kernel/inductive.cpp did not type check the nested inductive applications that are replaced by auxiliary types, so their…
When was CVE-2026-72844 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72844 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 20, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72844?
CVE-2026-72844 has a CVSS v3 base score of 6.3 (NVD). The EG score is currently aggregating — additional source signals are being incorporated as they become available..
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72844?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72844, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72844

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72844?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.