CVE-2026-72491

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c

The rdma->state field is modified without holding req_lock in both recv_done() and p9_cm_event_handler(), while rdma_request() accesses the same field under the req_lock spinlock. This inconsistent locking creates a race condition:

  • recv_done() running in softirq completion context sets
rdma->state = P9_RDMA_FLUSHING without acquiring req_lock
  • p9_cm_event_handler() modifies rdma->state at multiple points
(ADDR_RESOLVED, ROUTE_RESOLVED, ESTABLISHED, CLOSED) without req_lock
  • rdma_request() uses spin_lock_irqsave(&rdma->req_lock, flags) to
protect the read-modify-write of rdma->state

The race can cause lost state transitions: recv_done() or the CM event handler could set state to FLUSHING/CLOSED while rdma_request() is concurrently checking or modifying state under the lock, leading to the FLUSHING transition being silently overwritten by CLOSING. This corrupts the connection state machine and can cause use-after-free on RDMA request objects during teardown.

Fix by adding req_lock protection to all rdma->state modifications in recv_done() and p9_cm_event_handler(), matching the pattern already used in rdma_request(). Use spin_lock_irqsave/spin_unlock_irqrestore in the CM event handler since it can race with recv_done() which runs in softirq context.

Tested with a kernel module that races two threads (simulating rdma_request and recv_done/CM handler) on rdma->state with proper locking: 5.5M+ FLUSHING writes over 27M iterations with 0 lost transitions.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
52%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (8)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ebbcbe5c0db215feecc17def06178da443f4eea6
generic

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8aadc136d8e8d8fc95d7982d213cfe2234dfcf2b
generic

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d54894a1ee265a72d70f7cae1da6cc774cccc71
generic

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5424138848eb7d7d8a7196676e90a2cbf2142454
generic

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4cee2b8766045059d5e0b8114837b4a8efe827ac
generic

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3970a19a80de530b801b6256354d4a529a9a2d6c
generic

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/151f8cf5b23d8a534d884432a82a6d54d5a61989
generic

net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/13bf9879b778b2f4b260b45bed18f31806120d1e

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72491(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 46× in last 7d / 46× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-21 07:41 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-21 03:17 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-21 03:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-20 22:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-20 18:26 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-20 14:03 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-20 09:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-20 05:16 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-20 00:52 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-19 20:24 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-08-19 20:24 UTCGHSA enrichment
  13. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  14. 2026-08-19 15:56 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-19 11:31 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-19 07:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-19 02:42 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-18 22:14 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-18 17:50 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-08-18 17:50 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  22. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  23. 2026-08-18 13:18 UTCGHSA enrichment
  24. 2026-08-18 08:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  25. 2026-08-18 04:29 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 21 more
  1. 2026-08-18 00:05 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-17 19:39 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-17 15:15 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-08-17 15:15 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  6. 2026-08-17 10:51 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-08-17 10:51 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-17 06:27 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-17 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-17 05:57 UTCEG score recompute 9.80
  11. 2026-08-17 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  13. 2026-08-17 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-08-17 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  15. 2026-08-17 05:24 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  16. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  17. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  18. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  20. 2026-08-15 06:03 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72491?
CVE-2026-72491 is a critical vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/9p: fix race condition on rdma->state in trans_rdma.c The rdma->state field is modified without holding req_lock in both recvdone() and p9cmeventhandler(), while rdma_request() accesses the same field under the req_lock…
When was CVE-2026-72491 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72491 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-72491 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72491 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 48.4% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72491?
CVE-2026-72491 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72491?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72491, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72491

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72491?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.