CVE-2026-72472

CRITICALPre-NVD 9.89.8
EchelonGraph scoreHIGH confidence

Score 9.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: CRITICAL) published 2026-08-15. a secondary CVSS source baseline 9.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: epss, ghsa, secondary
Trending — 5 sources updated this week
9.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixSerious severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet.
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 1%CVSS: 9.8Exploit: None knownExposed: 0

No vendor fix yet — apply a workaround or compensating control (WAF / firewall / segmentation) and watch for a patch.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list

Lingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear to have issues.

Generally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock list to avoid use-after-free (UAF) problems with file locks. However, functions like nfs_delegation_claim_locks and nfs4_reclaim_locks cannot adhere to this rule because recover_lock or nfs4_lock_delegation_recall may take a long time. To resolve this, NFS switches to using nfsi->rwsem for the same protection, and nfs_reclaim_locks follows this approach. Although nfs_delegation_claim_locks uses so_delegreturn_mutex instead, this is inadequate since a single inode can have multiple nfs4_state instances. Therefore, the fix is to also use nfsi->rwsem in this case.

Furthermore, after commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), the functions nfs4_locku_done and nfs4_lock_done also break this rule because they call locks_lock_inode_wait without holding nfsi->rwsem. Simply adding this protection could cause many deadlocks, so instead, the call to locks_lock_inode_wait is moved into _nfs4_proc_setlk. Regarding the bug fixed by commit c69899a17ca4 ("NFSv4: Update of VFS byte range lock must be atomic with the stateid update"), it has been resolved after commit 0460253913e5 ("NFSv4: nfs4_do_open() is incorrectly triggering state recovery") because all slots are drained before calling nfs4_do_reclaim, which prevents concurrent stateid changes along this path. Also, nfs_delegation_claim_locks does not cause this concurrency either since when _nfs4_proc_setlk is called with NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, no RPC is sent, so nfs4_lock_done is not called. Therefore, nfs4_lock_delegation_recall from nfs_delegation_claim_locks is the first time the stateid is set.

CVSS v3
9.8
EG Score
9.8(high)
EG Risk
49(Track)
EG Risk 49/100SSVC: Track

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score: it fuses intrinsic severity with real-world exploitation and automatability so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner. Distinct from the 0–10 EG Score (severity).

How it’s computed
Severity98% × 45%
Exploitation1% × 40%
Automatability30% × 15%
Action: Routine — remediate on your standard cadence.
EPSS PROB
1%
EPSS %ILE
48%
KEV
Not listed

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (4)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
No patch confirmed yet.
generic

nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f161ef7b0dd2f51fdb002ba4a4e9bf0ee7409218
generic

nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/e68035178e65e2b3aa386ce61202ff33724ae418
generic

nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4837fb36219e6c08b666bc31a86841bad8526358
generic

nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cda95bf2e9c0e6b63545b7565fe4a1e474322f4

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72472(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 48× in last 7d / 48× in last 30d)

Each row is a source pipeline that fetched or updated this CVE on that date, with what changed. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. Most recent first.

  1. 2026-08-21 05:44 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-21 01:49 UTCEG score recompute
  3. 2026-08-21 01:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-20 22:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  5. 2026-08-20 21:55 UTCGHSA enrichment
  6. 2026-08-20 18:00 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-20 14:06 UTCGHSA enrichment
  8. 2026-08-20 10:11 UTCGHSA enrichment
  9. 2026-08-20 06:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-20 02:20 UTCGHSA enrichment
  11. 2026-08-19 22:25 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-19 18:30 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-08-19 18:30 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-19 17:04 UTCEPSS rescore
  15. 2026-08-19 14:35 UTCGHSA enrichment
  16. 2026-08-19 10:40 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-19 06:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
  18. 2026-08-19 02:45 UTCGHSA enrichment
  19. 2026-08-18 22:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  20. 2026-08-18 18:53 UTCGHSA enrichment
  21. 2026-08-18 14:58 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-08-18 14:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  23. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  24. 2026-08-18 13:49 UTCEPSS rescore
  25. 2026-08-18 10:43 UTCGHSA enrichment
Show 23 more
  1. 2026-08-18 06:47 UTCGHSA enrichment
  2. 2026-08-18 02:49 UTCGHSA enrichment
  3. 2026-08-17 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichment
  4. 2026-08-17 18:58 UTCGHSA enrichment
  5. 2026-08-17 14:17 UTCEG score recompute
  6. 2026-08-17 14:17 UTCGHSA enrichment
  7. 2026-08-17 13:47 UTCEPSS rescore
  8. 2026-08-17 10:22 UTCEG score recompute
  9. 2026-08-17 10:22 UTCGHSA enrichment
  10. 2026-08-17 06:27 UTCEG score recompute
  11. 2026-08-17 06:27 UTCGHSA enrichment
  12. 2026-08-17 05:57 UTCEG score recompute 9.80
  13. 2026-08-17 05:57 UTCGHSA enrichment
  14. 2026-08-17 05:54 UTCMITRE cvelistV5CVSS v3 → 9.8 · severity → CRITICAL
  15. 2026-08-17 05:28 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-08-17 05:28 UTCGHSA enrichment
  17. 2026-08-17 05:25 UTCMITRE cvelistV5
  18. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  19. 2026-08-16 14:56 UTCEPSS rescore
  20. 2026-08-16 02:15 UTCEPSS rescore
  21. 2026-08-15 06:23 UTCNVD update
  22. 2026-08-15 06:03 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-08-15 06:02 UTCMITRE cvelistV5first tracked

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72472?
CVE-2026-72472 is a critical vulnerability published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: nfs: use nfsi->rwsem to protect traversal of the file lock list Lingfeng identified a bug and suggested two solutions, but both appear to have issues. Generally, we cannot release flc_lock while iterating over the file lock list to…
When was CVE-2026-72472 disclosed?
CVE-2026-72472 was first published in the National Vulnerability Database on August 15, 2026, with the most recent update on August 17, 2026. EchelonGraph re-ingests CVE updates from NVD on a 2-hour cycle, so this page reflects the latest published state.
Is CVE-2026-72472 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72472 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 1% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, which ranks it in the top 51.8% of all scored CVEs.
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72472?
CVE-2026-72472 has a CVSS v3 base score of 9.8 (NVD).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72472?
Patch to the fixed version published by the affected vendor. Where vendor advisories exist for CVE-2026-72472, EchelonGraph cross-links them in the Vendor Advisories panel below — those typically contain the canonical remediation steps, fixed version numbers, and any vendor-specific mitigations.

Dependency Blast Radius

Explore the affected products and dependency analysis for CVE-2026-72472

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72472?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.