CVE-2026-72455

HIGHPre-NVD 7.17.1
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.1 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.1; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
7.1EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.1Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

apparmor: fix uninitialised pointer passed to audit_log_untrustedstring()

Commit 4a134723f9f1 ("apparmor: move check for aa_null file to cover all cases") intrdouced a small bug, where path_name() may pass a potentially uninitialized *name to aa_audit_file() if the path->dentry had been replaced with aa_null.dentry earlier on. This can lead to page fault like one observed on 7.0.2 openSUSE Tumbleweed kernel:

[51692.242756] [ T24690] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000f00000003 [51692.242762] [ T24690] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode [51692.242763] [ T24690] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page [51692.242765] [ T24690] PGD 0 P4D 0 [51692.242768] [ T24690] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI [51692.242772] [ T24690] CPU: 3 UID: 1020 PID: 24690 Comm: snap-confine Tainted: G O 7.0.2-1-default #1 PREEMPT(full) openSUSE Tumbleweed ab90b4c9940707f9cafa19bdad80b2cec52dbe51 [51692.242775] [ T24690] Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE [51692.242777] [ T24690] Hardware name: Framework Laptop 13 (AMD Ryzen 7040Series)/FRANMDCP05, BIOS 03.18 01/08/2026 [51692.242778] [ T24690] RIP: 0010:strlen+0x4/0x30 [51692.242783] [ T24690] Code: f7 75 ec 31 c0 e9 17 9f 00 ff 48 89 f8 e9 0f 9f 00 ff 0f 1f 40 00 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 f3 0f 1e fa <80> 3f 00 74 18 48 89 f8 0f 1f 40 00 48 83 c0 01 80 38 00 75 f7 48 [51692.242785] [ T24690] RSP: 0018:ffffd015eb1e3608 EFLAGS: 00010282 [51692.242787] [ T24690] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff89796198a360 RCX: 0000000000000000 [51692.242788] [ T24690] RDX: 00000000000000d1 RSI: 0000000f00000003 RDI: 0000000f00000003 [51692.242790] [ T24690] RBP: ffffffffb7ede090 R08: 00000000000005f5 R09: 0000000000000000 [51692.242791] [ T24690] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffd015eb1e3700 [51692.242792] [ T24690] R13: ffff8977a22bc380 R14: ffffffffb7ec5190 R15: ffff8977a0c8aa80 [51692.242794] [ T24690] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff897f640d8000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [51692.242796] [ T24690] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [51692.242797] [ T24690] CR2: 0000000f00000003 CR3: 00000006ad15f000 CR4: 0000000000f50ef0 [51692.242799] [ T24690] PKRU: 55555554 [51692.242800] [ T24690] Call Trace: [51692.242802] [ T24690] [51692.242804] [ T24690] audit_log_untrustedstring+0x1d/0x40 [51692.242811] [ T24690] common_lsm_audit+0x71/0x1d0 [51692.242816] [ T24690] aa_audit+0x5a/0x170 [51692.242819] [ T24690] aa_audit_file+0x18a/0x1b0 [51692.242825] [ T24690] path_name+0xd2/0x100 [51692.242829] [ T24690] profile_path_perm.part.0+0x58/0xb0 [51692.242832] [ T24690] aa_path_perm+0xef/0x150 [51692.242837] [ T24690] apparmor_file_open+0x153/0x2e0 [51692.242840] [ T24690] security_file_open+0x46/0xd0 [51692.242844] [ T24690] do_dentry_open+0xe9/0x4d0 [51692.242848] [ T24690] vfs_open+0x30/0x100

While here, initialise variables which are passed down to path_name().

CVSS v3
7.1
EG Score
7.1HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
32
EG Risk 32/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity71% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.1 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.1): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.1 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.1 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

August 17, 2026

Advisory Details (3)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

apparmor: fix uninitialised pointer passed to audit_log_untrustedstring() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/bcd1b34c21748531a3febaf7440632b89d8deab7
Web page

apparmor: fix uninitialised pointer passed to audit_log_untrustedstring() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/a5c79d44ef19203bd7cf6f3de8ff088112ebff95
Web page

apparmor: fix uninitialised pointer passed to audit_log_untrustedstring() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2791dd42d41e38805572b12116f721c97c4fcc0c

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72455(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(6)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(1 across 1 ecosystem)
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(6)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 6× in last 7d / 69× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 204 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 104 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-13 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-13 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-13 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  10. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  11. 2026-10-12 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-11 19:27 UTCEG score recompute
  13. 2026-10-11 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  14. 2026-10-11 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  16. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  17. 2026-10-09 20:07 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  18. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  19. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  20. 2026-10-06 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-06 22:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  22. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  23. 2026-10-06 09:13 UTCEG score recompute
  24. 2026-10-06 09:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  25. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-05 12:25 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-05 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  3. 2026-10-04 23:22 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-10-04 22:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  5. 2026-10-04 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  6. 2026-10-03 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  7. 2026-10-03 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  8. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  9. 2026-10-02 19:27 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-02 19:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  11. 2026-10-02 07:09 UTCEG score recompute
  12. 2026-10-02 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  13. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  14. 2026-10-01 09:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  15. 2026-09-30 21:05 UTCEG score recompute
  16. 2026-09-30 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  17. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  18. 2026-09-29 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-09-29 00:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  20. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  21. 2026-09-28 11:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  22. 2026-09-27 22:51 UTCEG score recompute
  23. 2026-09-27 22:51 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  24. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  25. 2026-09-27 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
  26. 2026-09-27 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  27. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 4th percentile
  28. 2026-09-25 02:37 UTCEG score recompute
  29. 2026-09-25 02:37 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  30. 2026-09-24 09:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  31. 2026-09-23 21:26 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-23 21:26 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  33. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  34. 2026-09-23 09:08 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  35. 2026-09-22 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
  36. 2026-09-22 20:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  37. 2026-09-22 04:19 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-22 04:19 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  39. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  40. 2026-09-21 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  41. 2026-09-21 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-21 03:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  43. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  44. 2026-09-20 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  45. 2026-09-20 01:39 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-20 01:39 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  47. 2026-09-19 13:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  48. 2026-09-19 01:03 UTCEG score recompute
  49. 2026-09-19 01:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  50. 2026-09-18 19:28 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  51. 2026-09-18 12:44 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  52. 2026-09-18 00:21 UTCEG score recompute
  53. 2026-09-18 00:21 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  54. 2026-09-17 11:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  55. 2026-09-16 23:33 UTCEG score recompute
  56. 2026-09-16 23:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  57. 2026-09-16 14:08 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  58. 2026-09-16 10:23 UTCEG score recompute
  59. 2026-09-16 10:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  60. 2026-09-16 05:15 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  61. 2026-09-15 21:45 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  62. 2026-09-15 08:52 UTCEG score recompute
  63. 2026-09-15 08:52 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  64. 2026-09-15 03:12 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  65. 2026-09-14 20:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  66. 2026-09-14 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
  67. 2026-09-14 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  68. 2026-09-13 19:53 UTCEG score recompute
  69. 2026-09-13 19:53 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  70. 2026-09-13 07:34 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  71. 2026-09-12 19:16 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-12 19:16 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  73. 2026-09-12 15:02 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  74. 2026-09-12 06:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-r85g-hm8c-rxmx · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.1
  75. 2026-09-11 18:38 UTCEG score recompute

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72455?
CVE-2026-72455 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: apparmor: fix uninitialised pointer passed to auditloguntrustedstring() Commit 4a134723f9f1 ("apparmor: move check for aa_null file to cover all cases") intrdouced a small bug, where path_name() may pass a potentially uninitialized…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-72455 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-72455 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of August 17, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-72455 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72455 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72455?
CVE-2026-72455 has a CVSS base score of 7.1 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72455?
A fix for CVE-2026-72455 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-72455 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-72455

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72455?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.