CVE-2026-72454

HIGHPre-NVD 7.87.8
EchelonGraph scoreMEDIUM confidence

“—” beside the score: it is equal to the CVSS score beside it.

Score 7.8 from GitHub Security Advisory (severity: HIGH) published 2026-08-15. A secondary CVSS source baseline 7.8; sources differ by 0.0.

Triggered by: GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
Sources: EPSS, GitHub Security Advisory, a secondary CVSS source
Trending — 4 sources updated this week
7.8EG
EchelonGraph verdictPlan a fixRemediate within your standard update timelines (the SSVC decision on this page).
  • High severity, but no confirmed exploitation yet
CISA-KEV: Not listedEPSS PROB: 0.2%CVSS: 7.8Exploit: None knownExposed services: Not assessed

A fix is available — apply it.

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Fix race in i3c_hci_addr_to_dev()

i3c_hci_addr_to_dev() walks bus->devs.i3c, which is protected by bus.lock (rwsem). However, it is invoked from the MIPI I3C HCI IRQ handler, which cannot take bus.lock. This allows concurrent device addition/removal in the I3C core to modify the list while it is being traversed, potentially leading to use-after-free or crashes.

Remove the dependency on the bus device list and introduce a dedicated lookup table. Add an ibi_devs[] array indexed by DAT entry, maintained under hci->lock. Update the array when IBIs are enabled or disabled, so that it always reflects the set of devices allowed to generate IBIs. Also update when IBIs are freed, to cover the corner case when an IBI is freed without first being disabled (e.g. oldedev in i3c_master_add_i3c_dev_locked()).

Move i3c_hci_addr_to_dev() into core.c, reimplement it using the new array, and add a lockdep assertion to enforce that hci->lock is held by callers.

Demote a message in PIO and DMA IBI handling, from an error to a debug message, because there is a race window when the condition can arise normally.

CVSS v3
7.8
EG Score
7.8HIGHmedium confidence
EG Risk
35
EG Risk 35/100

EG Risk is EchelonGraph's 0–100 priority score. It fuses impact severity (EG Severity, the CVSS base score, never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score) with real-world exploitation and automatability, under weights EchelonGraph set by hand, so you can rank equal-severity CVEs and fix the most dangerous first. Higher = act sooner.

How it’s computed (value × EchelonGraph’s weight)
Severity78% × 45%
Impact severity (EG Severity): CVSS 7.8 of 10. Never the KEV-floored or EPSS-lifted EG Score.
Exploitation0.2% × 40%
FIRST EPSS: the 30-day exploitation probability when EchelonGraph scored this CVE.
Automatability0% × 15%
CISA's BOD 26-04 default: no one has published Automatable for this CVE, and CISA treats it as “no” for a CVE not in KEV.
SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph): Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).
Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE.
Action: A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.
EPSS PROB
0.2%
EPSS %ILE
5th
KEV
Not listed

What the EG score is made of (scorer v4.0: the three questions the 0–10 score mixes, published apart · methodology)

The EG score (7.8): severity, escalated by confirmed exploitation. This CVE's 7.8 is its impact severity (EG Severity), not escalated.

EG Severity
7.8 HIGHCVSS-B, impact only: no KEV listing, EPSS or EG-KEV tier raises it.GitHub Security Advisory CVSS
EG Likelihood
0.2% within 30 daysSource: FIRST EPSS (model v2026.06.15, score date 2026-10-17). FIRST's exploitation probability, not an EchelonGraph model.
Confirmed exploitation
None on record (CISA KEV, EG-KEV Tier 1)Reported apart from the likelihood: an observed fact, not a probability.
EG Priority
SSVC Track at medium mission impactTrack at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).CISA BOD 26-04: 14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.Each input and its source: the SSVC and BOD 26-04 blocks below.

SSVC (CISA's decision table, applied by EchelonGraph)Track at low or medium mission impact; Track* at high (mission-essential systems).

A fix is available. Apply it within your standard update timelines.

Exploitation none (no CISA value, KEV listing or exploit code on record) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). EchelonGraph holds no SSVC assessment of this CVE from CISA: none of these inputs is from Vulnrichment. EchelonGraph applied CISA's decision table to them; CISA publishes SSVC inputs and the table, not a decision for each CVE. Mission impact is CISA's Mission & Well-being decision point, and only you can judge it. CISA's table makes it high when Mission Prevalence is Essential — the vulnerable component "directly provides capabilities that constitute at least one MEF for at least one entity" (MEF: mission essential function) — or when Public Well-Being Impact is Irreversible: "multiple fatalities are likely", the cyber-physical system "is likely lost or destroyed", "extreme or serious externalities" are imposed on other parties, or social systems such as elections or the financial grid "are destabilized and potentially collapse". CISA's decision table

BOD 26-04 (CISA's remediation timeline, Table 1)14 days if the affected system is publicly exposed; Fix on system upgrade if it is not.

In CISA KEV no (CISA's KEV catalog) · Automatable no (CISA's BOD 26-04 default) · Technical impact total (CISA's BOD 26-04 default). Where an input reads “CISA's BOD 26-04 default”, no one has published it for this CVE, and CISA's implementation guidance says: “If “Automatable” and “Technical Impact” information items about a CVE ID are not available and the CVE ID is not in the KEV Catalog, CISA will treat its values as “no” and “total,” respectively, until CISA or a third party provides metadata about the CVE ID. CISA will always provide the Vulnrichment data for a CVE ID listed in the KEV Catalog.” Whether your system is publicly exposed is yours to answer. BOD 26-04 binds US Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies; for anyone else it is CISA's published timeline, a reference rather than an obligation. The directive · how EchelonGraph applies it

Published

August 15, 2026

Last Modified

October 15, 2026

Advisory Details (2)

Auto-updated Aug 17, 2026
Patch available.
Web page

i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Fix race in i3c_hci_addr_to_dev() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/8f851cab401c28287d536b1347d76f6e219c0db6
Web page

i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Fix race in i3c_hci_addr_to_dev() - kernel/git/stable/linux.git - Linux kernel stable tree

https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/650716f23eac488c6696babdc7805f6a6b7427ad

Vendor Advisories for CVE-2026-72454(1)

These vendors published their own advisory mentioning this CVE — often with vendor-specific remediation steps + affected product lists not in NVD.

Patch Availability(7)

Patches are aggregated from vendor advisories (Red Hat, Microsoft, Cisco, GitHub) and package ecosystems (OSV, GHSA). Multiple rows for the same upstream release have been deduplicated.

Affected Packages

(3 across 3 ecosystems)
Debian:12(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.1.106-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (358 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:13(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.2~rc7-1~exp1 (181 versions)
  • every version on: no fix on record
—
Debian:14(1)
PackageVulnerable rangeFix by version rangeDependents
linux6.12.100-1 ... 7.1~rc7-1~exp1 (160 versions)
  • every version up to 7.1.5-1: fixed in 7.1.5-1
—

All Vendor Advisories

(7)

Data Freshness Timeline

(refreshed 13× in last 7d / 95× in last 30d)

Each row is a time one of our pipelines fetched, updated or re-scored this CVE. For example, "NVD update" means NVD published or revised its analysis for this CVE; "MITRE cvelistV5" means we ingested or refreshed it from the CNA feed. An arrow marks a change the record states ("CVSS v3 → 9.1"); EPSS and GHSA rows show the values recorded at that time, not what changed (EPSS values are rounded; hover one for the exact figures). Most recent first.

Showing the most recent 100 of 232 refreshes on record for this CVE.

A repeat, a row identical to one the same pipeline wrote less than 10 seconds earlier, is not a separate refresh and is not counted. None are among the latest 100 rows. The 132 oldest rows on record are not shown and were not checked, so the counts can still include repeats.

  1. 2026-10-19 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  2. 2026-10-18 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  3. 2026-10-18 03:16 UTCEG score recompute
  4. 2026-10-17 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  5. 2026-10-16 16:44 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  6. 2026-10-15 16:32 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  7. 2026-10-15 11:31 UTCEG score recompute
  8. 2026-10-15 11:31 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  9. 2026-10-15 10:29 UTCEG score recompute
  10. 2026-10-15 10:29 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-15 10:29 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  12. 2026-10-14 16:33 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  13. 2026-10-13 16:35 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  14. 2026-10-13 08:12 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-13 08:12 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-13 08:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-12 16:34 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  18. 2026-10-12 15:41 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-11 19:27 UTCEG score recompute
  20. 2026-10-11 16:43 UTCEG score recompute
  21. 2026-10-11 14:03 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-11 13:49 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  23. 2026-10-10 20:00 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  24. 2026-10-08 17:13 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  25. 2026-10-07 23:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
Show 75 more
  1. 2026-10-06 22:36 UTCEG score recompute
  2. 2026-10-06 22:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  3. 2026-10-06 15:18 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  4. 2026-10-06 09:13 UTCEG score recompute
  5. 2026-10-06 09:13 UTCVendor advisory
  6. 2026-10-06 09:13 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  7. 2026-10-05 17:43 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  8. 2026-10-05 12:25 UTCVendor advisory
  9. 2026-10-05 12:25 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  10. 2026-10-04 22:00 UTCVendor advisory
  11. 2026-10-04 22:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  12. 2026-10-04 08:09 UTCVendor advisory
  13. 2026-10-04 08:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  14. 2026-10-03 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  15. 2026-10-03 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
  16. 2026-10-03 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  17. 2026-10-03 14:26 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  18. 2026-10-02 19:33 UTCEG score recompute
  19. 2026-10-02 19:33 UTCVendor advisory
  20. 2026-10-02 19:33 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  21. 2026-10-02 07:09 UTCEG score recompute
  22. 2026-10-02 07:09 UTCVendor advisory
  23. 2026-10-02 07:09 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  24. 2026-10-01 19:50 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  25. 2026-10-01 09:28 UTCVendor advisory
  26. 2026-10-01 09:28 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  27. 2026-09-30 21:05 UTCEG score recompute
  28. 2026-09-30 21:05 UTCVendor advisory
  29. 2026-09-30 21:05 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  30. 2026-09-30 15:03 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  31. 2026-09-29 00:06 UTCEG score recompute
  32. 2026-09-29 00:06 UTCVendor advisory
  33. 2026-09-29 00:06 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  34. 2026-09-28 13:52 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  35. 2026-09-28 11:18 UTCVendor advisory
  36. 2026-09-28 11:18 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  37. 2026-09-27 22:54 UTCEG score recompute
  38. 2026-09-27 22:54 UTCVendor advisory
  39. 2026-09-27 22:54 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  40. 2026-09-27 13:48 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  41. 2026-09-27 08:32 UTCEG score recompute
  42. 2026-09-27 08:32 UTCVendor advisory
  43. 2026-09-27 08:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  44. 2026-09-26 15:59 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.2% · 5th percentile
  45. 2026-09-25 02:38 UTCEG score recompute
  46. 2026-09-25 02:38 UTCVendor advisory
  47. 2026-09-25 02:38 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  48. 2026-09-24 10:00 UTCVendor advisory
  49. 2026-09-24 10:00 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  50. 2026-09-23 21:36 UTCEG score recompute
  51. 2026-09-23 21:36 UTCVendor advisory
  52. 2026-09-23 21:36 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  53. 2026-09-23 17:54 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  54. 2026-09-23 09:12 UTCVendor advisory
  55. 2026-09-23 09:12 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  56. 2026-09-22 20:48 UTCEG score recompute
  57. 2026-09-22 20:48 UTCVendor advisory
  58. 2026-09-22 20:48 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  59. 2026-09-22 04:23 UTCEG score recompute
  60. 2026-09-22 04:23 UTCVendor advisory
  61. 2026-09-22 04:23 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  62. 2026-09-21 21:09 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  63. 2026-09-21 15:58 UTCVendor advisory
  64. 2026-09-21 15:58 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  65. 2026-09-21 03:32 UTCEG score recompute
  66. 2026-09-21 03:32 UTCVendor advisory
  67. 2026-09-21 03:32 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  68. 2026-09-20 20:16 UTCEPSS rescoreEPSS 0.1% · 2nd percentile
  69. 2026-09-20 15:07 UTCVendor advisory
  70. 2026-09-20 15:07 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  71. 2026-09-20 00:27 UTCEG score recompute
  72. 2026-09-20 00:27 UTCVendor advisory
  73. 2026-09-20 00:27 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8
  74. 2026-09-19 12:03 UTCVendor advisory
  75. 2026-09-19 12:03 UTCGHSA enrichmentGHSA-48cg-fm56-jr4v · GitHub severity HIGH · GitHub CVSS 7.8

Frequently asked(5)

What is CVE-2026-72454?
CVE-2026-72454 is a high-severity vulnerability; its CVE record was published on August 15, 2026. In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: i3c: mipi-i3c-hci: Fix race in i3chciaddrtodev() i3chciaddrtodev() walks bus->devs.i3c, which is protected by bus.lock (rwsem). However, it is invoked from the MIPI I3C HCI IRQ handler, which cannot take bus.lock. This allows…
When was the CVE record for CVE-2026-72454 published?
The CVE record for CVE-2026-72454 was published on August 15, 2026. That is the record's publication date; the vulnerability itself may have been made public earlier. EchelonGraph's copy of the record carries a last-modified date of October 15, 2026; the record at its source may have been updated since.
Is CVE-2026-72454 actively exploited?
CVE-2026-72454 is not currently on CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. FIRST EPSS estimates a 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days (5th percentile of EPSS-scored CVEs).
What is the CVSS score of CVE-2026-72454?
CVE-2026-72454 has a CVSS base score of 7.8 (a secondary CVSS source that NVD displays; NVD's own analysis pending).
How do I remediate CVE-2026-72454?
A fix for CVE-2026-72454 is available: update to the fixed version the vendor names in its advisory. The vendor advisories EchelonGraph has for CVE-2026-72454 are linked in the Vendor Advisories panel on this page.

Dependency Blast Radius

See which npm, PyPI, Go, and Maven packages are affected by CVE-2026-72454

Explore →

Is Your Infrastructure Affected by CVE-2026-72454?

EchelonGraph automatically scans your cloud infrastructure and maps CVE exposure using blast radius analysis.